Talk:Crossref
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crossref article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 10 December 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
CrossRef → Crossref – Current and correct capitalisation; see article lede. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support per MOS:TM and official name. Dicklyon (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Close Please use uncontroversial technical request: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial_technical_requests. Mootros (talk) 05:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Crossref and I4OC
[edit]@Pigsonthewing: stating that the I4OC is a "service" provided by Crossref is inaccurate. Crossref provides the infrastructure to collect and redistribute bibliographic and reference records obtained from publishers via its APIs and specifically through a service called CitedBy. The I4OC is not a service by Crossref (in fact, Crossref is not among the founders or stakeholders), but an independent advocacy initiative asking publishers to open up their reference records so they can be exposed by Crossref and reused by other parties with no copyright restrictions. Does that make sense? And if so, could you correct the wording in the article (I'd rather not do this myself since I'm directly involved in the I4OC).--DarTar (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- @DarTar: The service is that "citation data is made available", but I'm happy to re-word that to clarify, if you would like to suggest an improvement. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
open API misused by publishers
[edit]sometimes it seems publishers misuse this open API, for this article e.g., mentioned [here https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24896]. ThurnerRupert (talk) 16:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)