Talk:Criticisms of the Ulster Defence Regiment

Subversion in the UDR report

There seem to be som eslight innacuracies in the description of the report given by CAIn. By 2004 the PRO had merged in to The National Archives. The only document I can find in the catalogue whose description appears to fit that described wasn't opened until January 2005, not Januray 2004. There may be some confusion as documents are normally made available to the press etc a few days early (on an embargoed basis). Of course it's also possible I haven't found the correct document as CAIN don't give the document ref themselves (which they really should). David Underdown (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to leave the matter in your hands David. Thunderer (talk) 14:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added lead section

The article, as a copy and paste job, wasn't exactly the smoothest reading section. Please, if you can improve the quick lead I wrote, please do so. SirFozzie (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's an adequate job to tell the truth - thanks.Thunderer (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Bloodmoney Poster.jpg

The image File:Bloodmoney Poster.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:IRA Resistance Poster.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]