Talk:Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2012 Delhi gang rape case was copied or moved into Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://zeenews.india.com/news/delhi/iap-condoles-death-of-delhi-gang-rape-victim_819606.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130124235948/http://www.unwomen.org/2012/12/un-women-condemns-gang-rape-of-delhi-student/ to http://www.unwomen.org/2012/12/un-women-condemns-gang-rape-of-delhi-student/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
A comma after 2013?
[edit]Shouldn't there be a comma after 2013? If so, the gang rape article should be corrected, too.--Adûnâi (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- In the title? No. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: Obviously not in the title, but in the text instead. Shouldn't it be like "Seattle, Washington," and "on 23 March, 2020,"? I have found a pdf from the Indian Law Institute, but it has two ridiculous mistakes on two consecutive pages, so... I would't be surprised if Indians outright disregard the rules of punctuation.--Adûnâi (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2020 (UTC)