Talk:Copernic
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Copernic Agent was copied or moved into Copernic with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | Copernic Agent was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 August 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Copernic. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Product catalog
[edit]I think the product catalog should go. Rees11 (talk) 21:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
The link kicks you back to the same page, can someone fix that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.151.7.51 (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
24.200.96.227 (feb 21 2010) Copenic was quite popular software in the early 2Y's around here and gave much better results than Altavista and Google in that era, I think this article deserve to stay, but not as it is right now. How the product helped the early web and how it evolved over time should be mentioned in depth. I agree than the current page look like an ad and should removed for that, but the subject itself should be allowed to come back later in a better version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.200.96.227 (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)