Talk:Controlled payment number

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.conferma.com. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2014070110012142.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

S Philbrick (Talk) 15:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inadequate description

This article does not describe how these virtual card numbers work, or explain how benefits are achieved. FreeFlow99 (talk) 15:22, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dying a slow death

The article doesn't go into much history. Google OneTime Virtual Card seems to have come and gone with no comment. Bank of America ShopSafe is gone. PayPal discontinued theirs. Why? John Moser (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just turned on my Google Wallet virtual number. So it may have come and gone, but it has apparently come again :-) . -- Joe (talk) 01:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More information would be useful

For instance, a list of banks that continue to offer VCN's. (As of I type this, Capital One through their "Eno" browser extension, and Citibank with a shockwave-flashed based applet on their online banking page.

It might also be useful to describe the benefits of using this type of number/service for online purchases and subscriptions, which includes not having to get a new physical card if an individual merchant is compromised, as well as the ability to stop a service provider from continuing to bill (accidentally, or intentionally) even after you cancel service. (Refer to the AOL billing debacle: https://www.networkworld.com/article/2333450/aol-settles-improper-billing-lawsuits.html ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 56.0.84.24 (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uppercase change to applecase

Hello Arthurshelby36 (talk) 07:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can not withdrawal to my PayPal account

Need mon 139.216.153.220 (talk) 04:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Indistinguishable" is not true

This "alias" number is indistinguishable from an ordinary credit card number, and the user's actual credit card number is never revealed to the merchant.

Having recently turned on the ability to use virtual numbers with one of my payment providers, I tried replacing the card number on file with my VOIP provider. But they rejected it. So there has to be a difference, but what that is, I don't know. Based on the Wikipedia article covering BINs/IINs, the virtual number I tried would appear to be the same issuing company as the card number the VOIP company already had, so it would not seem to be that it's an issuer the VOIP company does not accept.

Rather than outright deleting this statement, I am unsure how it might be properly edited to reflect the truth more closely. -- Joe (talk) 01:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]