This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
How come this article has been neglected? What we have here is less a "need to wikify" than an "article request." I'm not one to start an extensive article on the NAAEC (though I'd be glad to contribute.) Is there any way to just delete this and post an "article request"?
- Darkhawk (10 Mar 2006, 18:53 EST)
This stuck out like a glaring and very big and black thumb:
Overall, none of these hypotheses were confirmed. NAFTA did not present a systemic threat to the North American environment, as was originally feared.
You've go to be f**king kidding. There are hosts of analysis which say exactly the obvious. No doubt this page was put up as a p.r. piece but it's got to be revised; such sweeping claims made by only one source are ludicrous in nature. And also noting that hte CEC is about a lot more than just a supplemental to NAFTA, though I understand the weight of the NAFTA material at present is due to the merge described above.Skookum1 (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
