Jump to content

Talk:Codabar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Same pattern

[edit]

Characters 'D' and 'E' have the same pattern ??? {{subst:unsignedIP2|14:15, 10 November 2006‎ (UTC)|80.146.217.194}

This article is a copyright violation

[edit]

Almost word for word from here: [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.104.124 (talk) 22:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I agree, this does seem to have verbatim text from the source you state. I have rewritten the article to remove the violations. Caltrop 14:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edited module width

[edit]

The module width quoted was 0.065 inches. This does not agree with the cited reference for that section which says 0.0065 inches. The latter certainly matches my experience of this code in the real world. It has the finest lines of any code I've come across. This is half the width of the supermarket product codes. But I can't agree with the stated 11 characters per inch. My calculations suggest that it should come to almost 14 characters per inch, perhaps dropping to 12.5 if you use a lot of the additional punctuation characters. This figure of 11 seems to be widely acknowledged, so for now I'm going to assume that I'm missing something and leave it alone. David ORourke (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Codabar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Codabar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid codabar image

[edit]

The sample image does not seem to be a valid codabar, as the separator is wide, not narrow. Either the image or the description seem to need a correction. 2600:1007:B028:2AF4:64AF:259C:6DBF:1D0B (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]