Talk:Claudia Reh

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 25 September 2024 by reviewer Netherzone (talk · contribs).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists

Missing sources?

added 13 References. Enough sources now? --Schwijker (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've left this info on your talk as well, but am posting here as well in the event that other editors may see it. Reliable sources are things like secondary sources such as newspaper articles (not press releases, but articles or reviews with a byline and content not based on a press release); magazine articles or reviews (for example in ARTFORUM magazine, Frieze, etc.) or articles in academic journals that are fully vetted and peer-reviewed; chapters in books from notable publishers. Unfortunately none of the citations you added in good faith to the article are considered reliable sources per Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. What are needed are secondary sources that are in-depth, significant coverage in reliable published sources that are fully independent of the person. Below is an analysis of why the current sourcing does not meet WP guidelines:

Not independent: Calendar listing for an event [1]
Not a reliable source: Blog [2]
Not independent: Press release, not an independent article or review about her or her work [3]
Not independent: Calendar listing [4]
Not independent: Festival route map [5]
Not independent: Festival route map [6]
Not independent: Press release [7]
Not independent: Festival bio paragraph [8]
Not independent: Festival participant page [9]
Not independent: User-submitted material, artist’s self-published video [10]
Not independent: User-submitted material, artist’s self-published video [11]
Unreliable source: YouTube is not considered a reliable source and it’s a user-submitted entry [12]
Unreliable source: User submitted content: [13]
Flicker with pictures on it is not a reference [14]
Not independent: User submitted content bio [15]

Here are some links that may be helpful to you as you search for independent significant coverage in reliable sources: WP:N, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV. What is of critical importance are sources (references) that are high quality, the number of sources is not as important - quality, not quantity is key. Hope that helps! Netherzone (talk) 23:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile I did lot of rework. esp. on refs. Schwijker (talk) 10:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwijker, I've accepted the draft, however there are still some problems with the referencing, in particular the embedded links. The citations should follow the proper formatting - for complete information on how to do this, see: Wikipedia:Citing sources, for a shorter how-to version, see: Help:Referencing for beginners. I'm going to place a maintenance tag on the article for now. Thanks for improving the article. Netherzone (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the formatting of the first reference (VIAF) as an example of a formatted citation. The ones that are embedded links of bare urls are prone to link rot, which is one of the reasons it is better to use the citation formatting guidelines. Netherzone (talk) 15:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tried to fix all of them. Schwijker (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greatly improved! Netherzone (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comment: All statements need to be sourced, including the date of birth. Greenman (talk) 06:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]