Jump to content

Talk:Classic car

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USA Bias

[edit]

Having read this article, I believe that it requires adaptation to make sure it describes the classic car movement throughout the world - not just in the USA/North America.

Got to say I agree with this 100% - not even a picture of a Rolls Royce or a Bentley? --Gavinio 16:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense because most English speaking editors will be from the US. People from other countries will just have to work harder. Who ever said life was fair? :) DirkvdM 10:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It makes no sense at all, Americans make articles about American products and Europeans about European products? What makes you think in the first place that most English speaking users are American and second that Americans would only want to read about American products? Being Dutch yourself proves that not only Americans read the English Wikipedia... DaFinch 16:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it's the mono-cultural self absorbed naval staring cultural trait that I share with other Americans- Although when I was in England they said we don't speak English- we speak American, I had to correct them- I speak TEXAN, where we at least have a border with another country. I agree with the first assessment that the article needs more examples and content from other parts of the world- and perhaps even a section on Chinese Autos (the Future Classic Cars) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.67.37.194 (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the term "Classic Car" is used outside of the US. Unless someone from Europe claims this term is used there, I disagree that the Americentric tone is not appropriate.HornColumbia (talk) 00:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term is used in the UK - which was still officially outside the US last time I checked. [1] -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 01:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Why do we have external links that point to classic car selling websites? Are we advertising for car sales here? That's not exactly kosher on Wik is it?--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 02:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures.

[edit]

Can we have a wider range of pictures? There are too many American cars and no British, Italian, Japanese or Scandinavian cars. Does noone own a picture of a Morris Traveller or an old Lancia or Toyota?(Morcus (talk) 20:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]


Safety Section

[edit]
Does not belong in this article. Maybe in a separate article, but it does not belong here and is clumsy and intrusive to the article.
If it is going to be kept, it needs to be rewritten for more clarity. For example there is not a state in the USA that 'prohibits'
using a classic car as a daily driver. Some states restrict mileage on vehicles REGISTERED as a "classic" but even in those states
those cars could be registered as a regular car and driven daily with no problems at all. The source article for that section is
equally vaguely written, and even has factual errors, for instance Virginia does not require cars not originally equipped with safety
belts to retrofit them for vehicle inspection (they are grandfathered in).

Some other points about some errors in this section: 
1. who is recommending to "to retrofit classic cars with seat belts"? 
2. "retro styles 2 and 3 point safety belts" are manufactured to replace belts or add belts to cars that originally
had belts or had them as an option. Nobody is making retro style belts for fitting onto cars that did not already
come with mounting points. The liability alone would stop such an idea in its tracks. The only way to add "belts" to
a car that did not come with them or did not have them as an option is to fully or partially cage the car and add
belts to that, which is an expensive and intrusive undertaking, and is rarely done.
3. "The suspension of classic cars may not be suitable for radial ply tyres, having been designed for bias ply
tyres" is nonsense. You really only run into problems going in the reverse (putting bias plys on a suspension designed
for radials). Radials are literally a 'bolt on improvement' in handling for any classic car, and can be found in all
sorts of sizes only the oldest and oddest (wooden wheels, for instance) car would have trouble mounting.
4. "Another problem with modern tyres on classic cars is that increased grip requires increased steering effort;
many classic cars don't have power steering." Is original research, to say nothing of being absurd. It is no harder
to turn a manual steering car with radials over bias plys at speed or even at low speed. Cars did not have power steering
often in the old days because it was an added complication and sapped power.

This entire section really has little to add to an overview article of "classic cars", it stands out sorely,
and has errors to boot. Someone needs to take a look at this.

False Science Comparison

[edit]

The collision between the Bel Air & the Malibu is misleading as the center of the Malibu hits the off-center front of the Bel Air. Where is the corresponding reversed video? It is time to stand up to this false science that has, unfortunately, become way to predominate.

Nantucketnoon (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article cites reliable sources for the content we have on the crash test. We don't enter into factual disputes with reliable sources just on the say so of an editor. That would violate the no original research policy. Can you cite sources which contradict the conclusions in the sources we have?

UK Terms

[edit]

I agree that the UK needs more representation here, especially as the market for classic cars is comparatively huge there. In particular, the UK uses distinct terms: classic, veteran, and vintage, which need a mention. The exact differentiation may not be universal but the ordering is. See Classic, Vintage, or Veteran, for instance TonyP (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

Thanks for your time
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Classic car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Professional Writing

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2024 and 5 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nfarrow93 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Aggieeditor2003 (talk) 20:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! I'll be making some edits over the next few days, focusing primarily on reorganization as well as potentially consolidating certain sections that have repeated information. Most of these edits will be worked on this weekend, and should be finished no later than 10/21/2024. I'll be sure to explain the reasoning for the edits I make, but please reach out if you have any criticisms, suggestions, or anything else that may be relevant. Nfarrow93 (talk) 15:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Classic_car&oldid=1251695496"