Talk:Christina Haack

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christina Haack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 6 May 2017, see discussion.
Merge to Flip or Flop, 19 May 2015, see discussion.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Christina Haack. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Christina Haack at the Reference desk.

Notability

I also disagree with the General Notability concern that is mentioned for Christina. I'm a fan of her interior design tips and I follow her on social media and her blog. I think she's great! Her page should stay although I agree more information about her on her own page would be great! We had a debate in our house about how old she was (I won, my husband didn't). More info about Christina please we love her! As for the assertion that she does not meet the notability criteria for Wikipedia, I respectfully disagree - for WP:ENT she is an actor in the third season of a popular TV show, she has amassed an enormous cult following (just ask any working Mom who loves interior design and check out her following on social media)and she also meets the third criteria, and is someone who has made a unique and innovative contribution to the field of entertainment - she's a self made multi-millionaire entreprenenur at the age of 31 who also happens to be the mother of one child (soon to be two). Christina is shattering stereotypes and inspiring the rest of us working Moms that anything really is possible. AidaAnne5 (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the General Notability concern that someone tagged here. El Moussa is the co-host of a very popular TV show - one I myself watch. I came to Wikipedia to find out more about her. She's definitely notable! The article itself does need improvement, though. (It's basically identical to the article of her husband, Tarek El Moussa.)

I agree that both Tarek and Christina should stay in Wikipedia. They host a prime-time TV show; that's pretty notable. I wonder if the original person has some other agenda. 24.178.98.98 (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no agenda, its WP policy. If you read WP:N and most specifically WP:ENT you can see that they do not meet the requirements. - Galatz ^Talk 00:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also feel that Tarek and Christina's Wiki pages SHOULD NOT be deleted. Flip or Flop is extremely popular, and YES, they both have a HUGE cult following, which is one of the notability requirements for celebrities. These people have had featured stories in People Magazine, have been featured on The Doctors, and Tarek's public battle with thyroid cancer has has amplified the public conversation around thyroid cancer. HGTV has also commissioned a spin off show called Flip or Flop: At Home, and the two have served as judges on Brother vs. Brother. Tarek and Christina meet ALL of these criteria: Entertainers Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. See WP:MUSIC for guidelines on musicians, composers, groups, etc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryannjean (talk • contribs) 23:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Ryannjean 23:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should stay up - Christina is notable, she is a celebrity and has been featured in a large number of national media - Print and TV. Christina and Tarek huge social media following and in every way are public figures who deserve their own individual wikipedia pages. Please don't delete these pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenBean1 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why this article is in deletion process, Christina is getting noticeable. This article is about her life, not about the show nor the fans, it is well-documented. The article doesn't break any rule nor policies regarding pages that are kind of biographical, also for this type of pages wikipedia encourages publishing material relevant to the person's notability, focusing on high-quality secondary sources. External sources like people.com or myfoxla.com are considered high-quality sources. --Jakeryanadler (talk) 03:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Absolutely notable enough. There are articles on other HGTV personalities, like Hilary Farr, Drew Scott, etc. The Wiki "purists" need to lighten up. There are articles on enough minutiae pet-projects that certainly this is acceptable. 66.67.32.161 (talk) 02:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should we delete the Net Worth section?

How relevant is that in an encyclopedia? Does Britannica have a section like this? And is the article cited even reliable?? It does not even cover the period after their divorce, which may have affected her net worth.

I think we should delete that.

Your thoughts Galatz?

Peter K Burian (talk) 18:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes delete. .....in fact delete all over. The sources are not reliable and they claim this bt stating they have reach these numbers with limited sources.--Moxy (talk) 23:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the same Christina?

^[1]

Article name change?

Since she changed her name legally to her new husband's last name, should the WP article name also change? Jooojay (talk) 05:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) B dash (talk) 00:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christina El Moussa → Christina Anstead – Name changed following second marriage after divorced from her first husband, taking the "Anstead" surname. ApprenticeFan work 16:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)--Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 07:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Just because she changed her name there is no reason to move the page. Her WP:COMMONNAME is unchanged. A redirect is all that is needed. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 29 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Close as disruptive; two moratoriums. 1). A full moratorium on move discussions for three months. 2). Nobody may initiate a new discussion for a minimum of six months after they have previously started one. This RM discussion was started eleven days after a previous discussion was closed. Whilst consensus can change, it doesn't change that quickly. Timrollpickering (Talk) 20:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christina El Moussa → Christina Anstead – After having had failed to support move in the last RM discussion, multiple number of sources use Christina Anstead and these are the examples: [1], [2]. With that, it will use her current marriage name from now. ApprenticeFan work 22:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nothing has changed. Just because some sources call her that, some still don't. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Should change title of article? To Christina hack?

Change Warrior4565666666 (talk) 23:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When her publisher and People Magazine accept her name change, WP has to follow. Evem more so, considering the demands presented by WP:Biographies of Living People. Ms Haacks personality rights would be violated if her publicly acknowledged name change would not find expression here.

Oalexander (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUsDDu0a0Aw

[1] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUsDDu0a0Aw

[1]