This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
While the line "Davies said he made an "honest mistake" in the expenses form he submitted for photographs at his Builth Wells constituency office: the mistake involved deliberate forgery" is rather amusing, I think it is too journalistic and biased for an encyclopedic article. Can we rephrase this? The Levitating Scot (talk) 15:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think the strange contrast is appropriate for the strange case....he committed forgery, in order to invoice the taxpayer for money he was entirely entitled to legitimately invoice the taxpayer for, had he used a different form. It seems very weird because it IS very weird, it is accurate to say that he made a mistake and didn't get any money he wasn't supposed to, but it's also accurate to say he intentionally committed forgery. 81.156.177.232 (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Levitating Scot: presumably this sentence is the issue: Davies said he made an "honest mistake" in the expenses form he submitted for photographs at his Builth Wells constituency office: the mistake involved deliberate forgery. This is unsatisfactory because it is unclear who said it was deliberate forgery, probably not Davies. It is later established that the judge at his trial indicated this. I think the second half of the sentence is unnecessary and I will delete it. Our report of the judge's remarks is sufficient. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
