Talk:Chełmno trials

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chełmno trials article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Chełmno trials appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the final conviction in the Chełmno Trials of the Chełmno extermination camp personnel was imposed in Poland 56 years after the war ended?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/May.

Wikipedia

On 8 April 2014, it was proposed that this article be moved from Chełmno Trials to Chełmno trials. The result of the discussion was moved.

German language terms

Nice work. This article mostly uses umlauts where German words require those, but with the exception of Sturmbannfuhrer, which should be Sturmbannführer. I didn't want to correct this myself as there might be a reason for dropping the umlaut in this case. I'm not familiar with the use of the term "Volksdeutsche" in English, but if it is to be used as a German word, then it should be "Volksdeutscher", turning this from plural to the male singular form. Schwede 66 19:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Poeticbent talk 03:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shortened footnotes

Not a DYK issue by any means, but I noticed that your shortened footnote links (the 'Patrick Montague 2012' bit) don't work. The way I know this referencing system, the main reference sits in a different section (e.g. bibliography), and every instance of the footnote gets listed in the referencing section. If you want me to, I could have a go at changing it around that way and by doing so get the links to work. Schwede 66 05:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please fix it? I tried to provide different links to different pages in the book, but apparently the template isn't meant to do just that. I don't know how else to improve the formatting of those footnotes. Poeticbent talk 06:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two different ways to achieve this. One would be based on the way you've set it up already, or the other way is how I did this earlier today with the James Cowan reference in the Douglas Maclean article. Which method should we adopt? Schwede 66 06:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you did a great job expanding that article! Would you know please how to provide weblinks to individual pages in the same book – described in detail only once – in bibliography, but also featuring links to different pages separately every time when quoted? The thing is, individual pages are easily accessible in Google Books preview. Maybe using standard <ref></ref> would be more appropriate than using {{sfn}} in this case, I don't know. Please feel free to do whatever is needed. I'm in way over my head! Poeticbent talk 07:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Morning is the best advisor. Poeticbent talk 17:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Well done. Schwede 66 19:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Auschwitz Trial which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chełmno trials. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/microsoft%20word%20-%206622.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chełmno trials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140220122211/http://www.jta.org/1963/01/22/archive/jewish-survivors-of-chelmno-camp-testify-at-trial-of-guards to http://www.jta.org/1963/01/22/archive/jewish-survivors-of-chelmno-camp-testify-at-trial-of-guards

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]