Talk:Charlotte's Web (2006 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charlotte's Web (2006 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Animals in media (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media

Australia: Melbourne Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Charlotte's Web (2006 film) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Film: Australian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television: Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Location

There were other places that it was fillemed like the new studios at the melbourne doclands and on the stand in the beachside suburb of williamstown.

Article Mistakes

The article points out the following, which I believe to be mistakes:

The 2006 Fern is about seven... The character, at no point in the film, come across as being only seven years old. Dakota Fanning is thirteen years old. Is there any citation for the character being only seven in the film? I'd like to see it because if Fern is supposed to be seven then it was poorly portrayed in the film.
Wilbur receives no marching band performance in celebration of his fame in the 2006 version. Yes, he does. As the camera pans up from the crowd to the stage were the fair governors are presenting Wilbur with his special medal, the band can be easily seen beginning their performance. Granted, the film does not show them actually marching.
Henry Fussy is left out of the 2006 film. What? No, he isn't! He is played by Julian O'Donnell. --Bentonia School 15:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another mistake I saw was that The lightning storm was left out of the 2006 version. According to the commercials and trailers I saw, there IS a thunderstorm in the movie; it occurs when Wilbur is born. --Wile E2005 19:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Differences in the Film

Should there be a section which holds the differences between the book and film as there is for other movies made from books? Invmog (talk) 04:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Haden Church's notorious adult films

What does this being a "Thomas Haden Church family film" have to do with anything? WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split the soundtrack article into two pages

NOT SPLIT

Split proposal received no support. -2pou (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I suggest that the soundtrack section of this page be split into two new pages: Charlotte's Web: Music from the Motion Picture and Charlotte's Web: Music Inspired by the Motion Picture. There's not enough room to list tracks from the soundtrack album. AdamDeanHall (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: firstly, if by "not enough room" you meant the article size is too big, that's not true... it's under 22k so still has some way to go before WP:SIZESPLIT becomes an issue. Secondly, the soundtrack section is unsourced... what you are proposing is creating two unsourced articles. That wouldn't fly, and would probably result in a rapid remerger into this article. Richard3120 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.