Talk:Chapel Hart

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Country music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chapel Hart is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} at 10:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: Country music group from Mississippi

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chapel Hart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 10:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Lazman321 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Lazman321 (talk) 02:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1 - Well written

1a - Clear and concise prose

1b - Adherence to the Manual of Style

2 - Verifiable with no original research

2a - Identifiable list of references

List of references follows relevant guidelines. ✓ Pass Lazman321 (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2b - Reliable sources

2c - No original research

Spotchecks here. Nothing too crazy. Lazman321 (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2d - No copyright violations

During spotchecks, I didn't notice any instance of close paraphrasing. The copyright detector apparently has an astounding score of 90.3%. However, I seriously doubt it's you or Wikipedia that is committing the plagiarism. The article when created has specific language that is still used in the article today, while the website supposedly plagiarized also uses similar wording but refers to events that would have happened after the article was created. As a result, I doubt this article has plagiarism. ✓ Pass Lazman321 (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 - Broad in its coverage

3a - Main aspects

3b - Focused

Doesn't stray off topic nor go into excessive detail about the band. ✓ Pass Lazman321 (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

4 - Neutral

5 - Stable

Only two edits since October and no discussion on the talk page indicates this article is very stable. ✓ Pass Lazman321 (talk) 01:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6 - Illustrated by media

6a - Copyright tags

The one image in this article has a valid copyright tag. ✓ Pass Lazman321 (talk) 01:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6b - Relevant media

The one image in this article is of the band itself. ✓ Pass Lazman321 (talk) 01:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

7 - Verdict