Talk:Catherine McQueen

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 November 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Date of birth

If you check the page history, the date of birth of the subject has been subject to edits. My wife was a contemporary of the subject at school and states that her age is 5 years older than stated, as does one other editor. Does anyone have a birth certificate, or school record etc. available? TimSmall (talk) 09:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Her exact age is no big deal anyway, if we havent got a reliable cite just keep it out, this mirror article says she was 29 in 2005, so that makes her birth year as 75 or 76, for what its worth, I have seen so many disputes at ladies articles over birth year as it is as they say a ladies prerogative.. Off2riorob (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I've added all the relevant stuff I've searched out, but couldn't quite find space / be bothered to insert http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/aug/19/mondaymediasection9 so put it here for anyone interested. Bigger digger (talk) 02:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catherine McQueen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717183337/http://www.edinburghacademy.org.uk/seniorprospectus/alumni/mcqueen.htm to http://www.edinburghacademy.org.uk/seniorprospectus/alumni/mcqueen.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]