Talk:Caterham Valley

This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography

Surrey

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related

Untitled

In WP:SURREY this is languishing at stub class. Yet if improved, most of its material would be duplicated from Caterham.

As a geographically barely separated ward from the one other shared by Caterham that only has approximately 10,000 people, not a historic ecclesiastical parish and as not all wards are notable in their own right,consensus tends to be towards successful conversion of it to a section of Caterham under the heading localities. Redundancy otherwise is a problem, instead focussing on what is notable and applicable to a whole settlement, not duplicating all of the necessary geographical content (this principle is set out in two sections of how to write about UK settlements). - Adam37 Talk 19:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]