Talk:Caryodendron orinocense

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 November 2019 by reviewer Sagotreespirit (talk · contribs).

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caryodendron orinocense has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 18, 2020. (Reviewed version).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Caryodendron orinocense/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 19:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC) I'll have a go at this one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

This is a well-organized and well-cited article on a tree species.

"used for nutritional and cosmetic purposes" - why not say "is edible, and can be used in cosmetics".
- Done. Change to "which is edible and is also used in cosmetics."

Image captions don't need a "." at the end unless they are full sentences (5 to remove).
- Done

"nut by-products" - this means the pressed cake once the oil has been extracted? Better say so.
- Done

"high contents in proteins" - "high content of proteins" might be better.
- Done

"even when the plan shows callus growth" - does "plan" mean "cutting" here? Better say so.
- That was a spelling mistake. "plan" means "plant". Corrected.

"an allurement for bees" - perhaps "to attract bees".
- Done. Changed to "Furthermore, the tree also attracts bees through the nectar excreted from its leaves, aiding in the tree's pollination."

"autochthonous" - I did Greek but many readers won't have. I think we usually use "resident" here.
- Done

"displays a dense and leafy crown" should be "has a dense and leafy crown".
- Done

"The species displays recalcitrant seed," - better would be "The seeds are recalcitrant," linked as now.
- Done. Changed to "The species' seeds are recalcitrant"

" exhibits periodic shedding" should be "is periodically shed".
- Done

I'm a bit doubtful about the 'Ecological value' section: don't these advantages apply to almost ANY local tree species? It's an error to claim specific benefits when general benefits are all that apply.
- Reduced scope of "ecological value" section to retain specificity to only this species, and not to all indigenous trees. Let me know if you agree with these changes.

Images: all fine. Nice to see your own photos in service!

That's about it from me.

- Sorry that it's taking me a bit of time. I'll get it done by EOD Friday.CPC273 (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it, thanks for letting me know. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:47, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- - All changes complete. Let me know if you agree with the changes. Thanks! CPC273 (talk) 21:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the work, and the fine article. Promoting now. I do hope you'll feel able to take the time to review one or two articles from the GAN queue. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]