Jump to content

Talk:Carlisle/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Bias

This article has some bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.151.237.194 (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2005 (UTC)

Only some? Let's try harder, people! -- John Fader (talk · contribs) 02:26, 9 March 2005 (UTC)

Tabled

In rewriting the thing about the cursed stone, I deliberately avoided the word "tabled". While I agree that british articles should be written in british english, "tabled" means essentially the opposite of what you'd imagine in american english, and thus ran the risk of really confusing some poor yank reading the article. In britspeak, "tabled" means "proposed", but in yanktalk it means "postponed until another meeting". -- John Fader (talk · contribs) 02:26, 9 March 2005 (UTC)

Flood picture

If you look in the history of this page you'll see I tried to put in a picture of the flood I took, but it didn't align quite right. I'd appreciate it if someone better than me could have a go. Or maybe you don't think there should be one? I do, as it is quite a big part of the city's recent history. Thanks. Microwave85 23:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Latin Name

Google returns some web pages giving Luguvalium as the Roman name for Carlisle. Anyone have a source? --Gil Gamesh 22:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Article needs expansion

This article needs significant expansion. The city is of great historical importance yet some small villages in Cumbria have longer and more detailed articles. I have split transport out into a new section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.219.75 (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Catholicism

Why is Carlisle included in the WikiProject Catholicism? The only reason I can think of is that it was once like many other English ciites the seat of a catholic diocese can anyone else give me a reason for its inclusion? Penrithguy 18:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

102 Miles

'The famous Scottish Indie Rock Outfit "102 Miles" take their name from the distance from Glasgow Central railway station to Carlisle.'

If they're so famous, why don't they have a Wikipedia page? Not that it's impossible that they're famous, but if they are somebody should get to it. But I've certainly never heard of them, so I'm doubtful — TheJames 11:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

They have some pages, for instance channel4 music... check out -
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=102+miles&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enGB228GB228 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.47.21 (talk) 17:53, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Castle and cathedral

The castle keep is well preserved but the rest of the fortress has been restored and rebuilt many times.

The west end of the cathedral was destroyed by the Scots 1645-52, not Cromwell.

The cathedral east window is a magnificent composition of flowing tracery 51 feet high. Whether it is larger than that at York Minster I'm not sure. The York east window is the largest expanse of mediaeval stained glass in the world.

As Paul Nixon appears in the residents section, there seems little point in having a special cricket section just for him.

Sir Walter Scott was married in the cathedral december 1797.

Bandalore 17:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Districts/suburbs of Carlisle

Do we really need this section listing the electoral wards of Carlisle and what type of housing you find there? Frankly, it's a bit... how can I put this... boring. Famousdog (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I apologise for being boring but there are similar sections on other articles about towns and cities Penrithguy (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Carlyon

Kevin Carlyon is not, as the article claims, the "high priest" of British white witches. He is a rather eccentric attention-seeker who has for years been trying to make himself a thorn in the side of the British Wiccan community. He models his "High Priest of the Witches" claim on the title "King of the Witches" that many gave to the late Alex Sanders, who Carlyon interviewed a couple of days before his death (the interviews are distressing to listen to, as Kevin eagerly asks for more stories, ignoring the requests of the ill Sanders for a glass of water!). He is seen by the Wiccan community as ridiculous, exploitative and unethical.

Check out his site http://www.kevincarlyon.co.uk/. He's clearly trying to rub the Wiccan and Pagan community up the wrong way, adopting the title "The Living God of All Witches" "just to add to the controversy between other witches".

Cheers all, just a heads up. Fuzzypeg★ 00:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, so you insist on keeping him and his opinion. Well, I'm just registering with you that this claim of his is found highly insulting and defamatory by other British witches. Fuzzypeg★ 22:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

A press release by Scottish witches on the subject can be found here. Fuzzypeg★ 01:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
(sigh) That's is all well and good, but this is an article about Carlisle, not a soapbox for your witchy problems with Kevin Carlyon. The story is of interest to those interested in Carlisle and most people won't be interested in the internal politics of white-witchery in the UK. My suggestion is, make a page for Kevin and put your criticisms there, and anybody interested can follow the link. Famousdog (talk) 13:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
(sigh) The article started out by repeating false claims, which are insulting to certain people. You may not be one of those insulted, but that's no reason to be dismissive. I've made a minor alteration to the wording which I think finally makes it satisfactory. I still don't understand why Mr. Carlyon's opinion is notable, but then, I don't keep tabs on British tabloid media, living in New Zealand (and I've never even been to Carlisle), so I'll trust your judgement on that. Cheers. Fuzzypeg★ 22:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Capital of England?

Ive been lead to believe that Edward I held TWO parliaments there. One in 1300 and the other in 1307. Would that make Carlisle the English Capital city intead of London on those two dates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAFFA (talk • contribs) 15:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

To put it simply: no. It doesn't work like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.240.209 (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Picture

why does the main picture show Carlisle in relation to Scotland not the country it's actually in - England! We wouldn't show Paris in relation to Italy would we? Anon. 20:48 3/6/08 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.206.242 (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I have changed it to the old picture of Carlisle within Cumbria Penrithguy (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Photographs of Carlisle Cathedral needed

Could someone who lives in Carlisle please photograph the East Window of the cathedral, preferable from the inside. Note that it is the tracery that is of particular importance. The window always looks very bright in photos. A Photo taken from the other end of the choir, with flash, might show some of the stained glass as well. The glass in the tracery is medieval. Pic needs to show the entire window.

A nice photo of the organ case would be good as well, and perhaps the Choir stalls, which are 15th century, the regimental chapel, and the carvings on the capitals in the choir..... Upload to Wiki Commons, and drop me a message! Amandajm (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Carlisle rugby football club

Hello, Any chance someone could start a page about carlisle rugby football club please. I am not sure how to do this so thought I should ask. They have a website at http://www.carlislerugby.co.uk

Thank you in advance

A 23 oct 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki login2 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Simply Carlisle

I was looking to add SimplyCarlisle.com to the external links section on the Carlisle page, but an editor has removed the link.

SimplyCarlisle.com is a new dirctory site and it provides free links to the websites of any business in Carlisle, making it a good old comprehensive source when searching for restaurants, estate agents etc in the city. You also don't just get an address and phone number with website links only for the one or two companies that have paid.

I would invite another editor to repost the link if they too feel it would be a worth while addition and resource.

86.136.237.63 (talk) 19:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

This kind of link is deprocated in wikipedia and many look upon it as commercial spam. Wikipedia is not a business directory for local Carlisle people. Thanks for your good faith addition, but it cannot be allowed to stand. Sorry 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

I can respect an editorial decision for Wikipedia (even if I don't understand it) however I'd hope you'd provide true comment on our site. To decribe our site as "commercial spam" is quite bizare, we have spent hundreds of hours qualifying sites to make sure there are hundreds of links to resources such as local weather, train times for specific local stations, cinema times direct from local cinemas, and countless clubs and societies and sites of special interest, really picking out the best of the web locally thus making it relevant. To quote an email in yesterday from the Princess Theatre in Torquay with respect to the Simply Torquay site; "Your site is lovely! easy to understand nice and clear...".

86.136.166.70 (talk) 12:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

21stCenturyGreenstuff said that "This kind of link is deprocated in wikipedia and many look upon it as commercial spam". It's the link that's regarded as spam, not your site. The underlying problem is avoiding Wikipedia becoming just another link directory. Nobody's disrespecting your site, --Northernhenge (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

We thought our sites would have been of use to your readers, but a link to us hasn't been possible, but now we'd kindly ask these discussions be removed as they can only damage our sites name and it's people's livelihoods that are effected. Kind Regards

86.136.166.70 (talk) 16:17, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

That's not how it works, especially when you go around deleting other's comments on talk pages. --Blowdart | talk 17:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't think anybody has said anything bad about any of your sites and I am sure they do an admirable job for the communities they serve. Sorry but it is not considered correct to delete stuff off a talk page, (although editors can freely delete information off their own user space talk pages). If the talk page gets too big the page may be archived at some stage in the future (and probably will be). The fact that wikipedia looks upon links to commercial directories in general as commercial spam does not denegrate the activities of your venture in any way whatsoever. Good luck with your venture 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Request for pronunciation information

Can a bona fide local provide a pronunciation for the town name? I live in a US Carlisle with the stress on the second syllable and I'm wondering if the real Carlisle is pronounced the same way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.9.56.118 (talk) 15:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

In my experience, its pronounced car-LILE in Scotland and CAR-lile in England. Famousdog (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
It's pretty much always pronounced CAR-lile in the Scottish Borders, though. 80.41.193.138 (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Note the poem The Armada by Thomas Babington Macaulay which ends
Till Skiddaw saw the fire that burned on Gaunt’s embattled pile,
And the red glare on Skiddaw roused the burghers of Carlisle.
where the scansion clearly implies the stress on the second syllable. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Just to muddy things further, (but probably logical enough given what FamousDog says), I'm from Carlisle and I pretty much say it with equal stress on both syllables, maybe slightly, slightly more on the first, but I'm having to say it over and over to myself to get that. Sort of like sitting at the opticians when they slot a new lens in and ask if it's better or worse. Definitely further up in scotland, say glasgow and north, the second syllable is stressed...kur-LYLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.176.163.106 (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

"Famous" residents

Okay, I removed a couple of persons from the famous residents list. This list is now getting pretty long and the notability criteria pretty lax. I googled "Matthew Begg poet" and didn't get any hits at all. Also, Charles Shepherd has been redlinked for a year or so and still hasn't got an article about him specifically, so he's gone. I think another way we could reduce the list is by eliminating some people who were only in Carlisle temporarily, or weren't born there, like Richard Madeley... Famousdog (talk) 08:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Page move

Where was the consensus generated for the move to Carlisle, Cumbria? I can see no consensus to move, and I suggest its moved back pending further discussion. Jenuk1985 | Talk 21:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

It was done in the spirit of WP:BOLD. But hear me out... take a look at Salford, and the discussion at Salford, Greater Manchester; there there was a unanimous consensus and all agreed the change was very positive and gave good reasons for the support. There has been longstanding uncertainty about the primacy of the term "Carlisle" and confusion as to city status. Salford is one working example of this approach, Lincoln and Lancaster are others. I'm hoping to get round to some of the others. --Jza84 |  Talk  21:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Ya all know Carlisle, Ontario redirects to Carlisle? A quick look-see shows most are expecting to find Carlisle, Cumbria. Seriously, it can be done, but is it worth creating the grief? Kbthompson (talk) 23:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm confident this is worth putting to rest and believe that the change is necessary to bring Wikipedia out of the dark ages and present the issue more neutrally and clearly for our readers. Because "Carlisle" (proper) has taken primacy, it's meant people are expecting to find it is a city - the City of Carlisle. Then we have others who think we should have mergers, which has proven to never achieve consensus and wipes out either the history of the settlement, or the history of the outlying areas. Who decided Carlisle proper should take primacy over the city in the first place? I have faith this is a very good change, good for Wikipedia and our readers and eliminate a lot of confusion. --Jza84 |  Talk  23:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I have no opinion on the move itself, but I feel that a move of a major article like this should achieve consensus before carried out. Jenuk1985 | Talk 23:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
There was no WP:CUMBRIA I could take this to, and this talk page seems seldom edited. But that said, I'm not insensitive to the fact this was a very bold move. But with all my work on places in the region, and development of WP:UKGEO and WP:UKCITIES, I'm still confident that this was a move waiting to happen. The consensus at Salford melded the idea as a wise and productive choice, conductive to the good of the project. Would you both be willing to back the move, if say, I worked on the City of Carlisle (towards something more like say City of Salford)? --Jza84 |  Talk  23:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
As I said, I have no opinion (or knowledge) related to the area, so its not worth trying to convince me to be for or against such a move! Jenuk1985 | Talk 23:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
No problem - was just trying to erk one out of you! Hope you can see method to my madness if nothing else though :S --Jza84 |  Talk  23:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree with the madness 8^) - or should that be the method? There's a lot of work associated with these major page moves - as you well know. It also places a lot of responsibility on editors to get it right - I just corrected a load of football articles that were linking to places. Ultimately, I want to avoid constructs like 'Walford, London is the central district of the London Borough of Walford; a part of East London within Greater London'!
It is however, systematic and applies the UKCITIES naming convention. Kbthompson (talk) 09:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Implementation

[<-] about 750; also links to Carlisle, England should probably be emptied and redirected here. Kbthompson (talk) 09:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
OK, fixed Carlisle, England ... One thing came up, do you reckon the historic 'governor' applied to the castle, or the town? Kbthompson (talk) 10:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Not sure, that's a grey area for me. :( --Jza84 |  Talk  22:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Where's the example? Nev1 (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
John Holland, 1st Duke of Exeter - there was another somewhere; much the same prose ... Kbthompson (talk) 10:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I'd say link that to Carlisle, Cumbria - it will give the most context IMHO.
Should I make a AWB request to pipelink the existing Carlisles to this page? --Jza84 |  Talk  11:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Looking at the text, constables look after castles, governors look after settlements. Nev1 (talk) 18:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
[<-} There's about 200 left; Category:People from Carlisle needs attention. Someone took a strict view of Carlisle and removed things called 'Carlisle' - like the railway station, the cathedral, etc. - hence some were done manually. Be good if someone could check what I've done. Thanks Kbthompson (talk) 18:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and need a County Borough of Carlisle article! cheers Kbthompson (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I'll get on to that. :) --Jza84 |  Talk  18:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Ozzy Osbourne

Ozzy Osbourne? A singer-songwriter? Technically that may be true, but I doubt it is how most people would describe him. Hell-raising heavy metal singer might be nearer the mark. Skinsmoke (talk) 19:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Osbourne never moved to or lived in Carlisle, he was left behind in Birmingham when Iommi and Ward formed the band 'Mythology' that based itself in Carlisle. Iommi sought out Osbourne when he returned to Birmingham after Mythology split. Read the biography carefully at[[1]]. Conversely Tony Iommi of Black Sabbath could be added to the resident list. Iommi lived in and was a resident of Carlisle for over twelve months, Osbourne's later stay of only a couple of weeks makes him a visitor NOT a resident.21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 22:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Carlisle, Cumbria → Carlisle — This is the English encyclopedia so I would have thought that the city in England should be the prime topic. Homan's Copse (talk) 11:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Support. English [language], not English [England]; nevertheless, the English city is the largest and most significant settlement of this name. PC78 (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy close; nominator appears to be making WP:POINT-y nominations in protest of the request at Talk:Dover. Powers T 12:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment Other similar nominations by user have been closed. As this one appears to have a legitimate case have left this open.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose The placement of the disambiguation page at the primary topic was deliberate to prevent the confusion of City of Carlisle with Carlisle, Cumbria it is part of set of moves in hand or planned to clarify the situation where the settlement and the administrative unit have effectively the same names. See also Salford as an example of this. Keith D (talk) 13:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Extending comment - by having the dab page at the primary topic also allows the easy identification of links that need to be dabed and fixed. If an article is at the primary topic then locating and fixing inadvertent links from other articles is difficult. Keith D (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Support This is kind of an odd situation. We have a genuine city, and then a government entity called "city" which is not a city. When people refer to the City of Carlisle, they're usually referring to the actual city, and not a government entity with a confusing name that includes a ton of rural land. I would even go as far as moving City of Carlisle to City of Carlisle (Local government district) to make it clear that this "city" is not a city as anyone else understands it. A disambig link on top will be vital, saying something like This article is about the populated urban center. For its government entity, see City of Carlisle (Local government district). For other uses of Carlisle, see Carlisle (disambiguation) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:38, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment A good comparison to this is Juneau, Alaska, another city whose government entity includes huge amounts of rural land as well as other towns, such as Douglas. In this case, there is no separate article for the government entity, despite its size. It might make sense to follow that precedent here and merge the two Carlisle articles into one. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose largely for the same reasons as Keith D. In response to Donde's suggestion, given the different boundaries of the settlement and the government district, they obviously require separate articles. If you look at the content of the two, you'll see that the focus differs greatly (or for a more developed example check out Salford, Greater Manchester and City of Salford). The current dab setup is intended to avoid confusion between the two entities; the brief explanation makes the differences plain and the reader can choose which article is more relevant to them. Take a look at this news story for example; although it relates to Salford rather than Carlisle, it illustrates the problem of confusion. It opens with "Some school rebuilding projects across Salford could be axed after the council was told to make savings of about 40% to the budget". I'm looking to include this information in one of the articles but it's not clear whether the building projects are in the settlement or the borough; from my experience of having worked on a few borough articles I'd say it's probably the wider borough as in educational contexts sources usually refer to whole boroughs, but it's not explicitly clear and I'd need to find confirmation from somewhere else. By having a dab page we're trying to avoid this confusion. I'm worried that this is a knee-jerk reaction to the proposed moves of Plymouth and Cambridge. What we have here works so I don't see a need to change it. Nev1 (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Nev1 and KeithD. DC T•C 02:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose, There is no use trying to guess which 'city' or article is the primary here. Also as KeithD pointed out, having Carlisle as a dab page provides an effective way to deal with differentiating between City of Carlisle and Carlisle, Cumbria. Additionally it is not just these two article that recieve lots of access; as terrible perhaps as it is, the redirect Carlisle Cullen gets lots of hits as well. -France3470 (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Support Much more clear-cut than say Lincoln. I'm completely unmoved by these local government alternatives; this is certainly primary. Johnbod (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose. The claim for primary topic here is preposterous without basis. The criteria is that anyone entering "Carlisle" is much more likely to be looking for this topic than any other, and more likely to be looking for this topic than all other topics combined. Considering there are two dozen notable people with the surname listed on the Carlisle surname page, coupled with the reasonable assumption that people often look up people using a search by surname, that alone invalidates the primary topic claim. Beyond that, there are a dozen other towns named Carlisle in the U.S. alone, and about a dozen other uses. For a topic which gets only about 300 hits per month day and so many competing uses, there is no way this can be the primary topic. --Born2cycle (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
300 per month? While I agree that the article should stay where it is (although for different reasons) you've misread the figures. This article gets closer to 10,000 views per month. Nev1 (talk) 00:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, for some reason I thought each bar represented one month, not one day. Anyway, 10,000 per month is much more significant than 300, of course, but, even then, picking just one of the Carlisle people, Kitty Carlisle, she alone gets 5,000 hits per month. City of Carlisle gets over 5,000 too; those two alone, together, get more hits than this article. It's probably safe to say that this Carlisle is the most popular, but primary topic requires much more than that. --Born2cycle (talk) 00:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Speedy close as no move. It is only a month since the last request and nothing has changed since then. Lets get back to improving articles rather than wasting time on moving articles around. Keith D (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


Carlisle, Cumbria → Carlisle — This is by far the most common use of the word, Carlisle was viewed 7322 times in 201009, while Carlisle, Cumbria was viewed 9949 times in 201009. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 13:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Toponymy

The section on Carlisle's name is vague, unsupported and in some cases inaccurate so I've replaced it.

The Romans called their settlement at what is today Carlisle, Luguvalium, as evidenced by Roman writing tablets recently excavated and displayed at Tullie House Museum, bearing this name as the address. Luguvalium can be interpreted from Latin as "the place, or wall (stronghold ?) of Lugus" (a local deity) [this theory has been refuted]. Around the 11th and 12th centuries, however, surviving documents show the place name spelt Caer (castle) Luel or Llewelyn [dates, sources?]. Luel, and its variants are Cumbric personal names [? evidence], and it has been proposed [by who?] that this was always the basis of the local name, which had been preserved by the continuity of Cumbric-speaking peoples in the area, from before the Roman imposition of a Latinised version [could the Luguvalium not just be a Latinised form of a British name, like Londinium etc? There's no evidence for an imposition here]]. The fact that Cumbria (from Cymru or similar roots) was held by the Celtic kings of Rheged in the 9th century [there's no evidence Rheged still existed this late] may have stimulated a revival of the Cumbric language and reinstatement of earlier Celtic place-names. Cumbric is no longer spoken, but the surviving Welsh language has Caerliwelydd as the modern name for Carlisle. Scots Gaelic has Cathair Luail as the modern name.

Psammead (talk) 20:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Curse

A) Should probably just be moved to Curse of Carlisle rather than being treated as a section of the page here.
B) Is currently ridiculously in violation of WP:NPOV and needs a complete rewrite by someone familiar with (but not virulently partisan about) the stone controversy. — LlywelynII 09:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 3

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. I would recommend that this not be renominated again for a while unless there is something new. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Carlisle, Cumbria → Carlisle – Carlisle is a 2000 year old city in England of significant importance, something which is agreed on by the projects it is attached to. Why it should be competing with small towns in the US? I don't believe people searching for London, Arkansas are getting directed to the London (disambiguation) page. Also anyone searching for someone with the surname: Carlisle should really be typing the forename of said person. There are far more people with the surname York than Carlisle, yet the page York is linked (rightly) to the location: York.

Another problem is the way Carlisle is split into the location and County Borough, Government District. I can imagine most people looking for Carlisle, the location, would click on City of Carlisle which in most cases is not what they are looking for.

So please can we let the current Carlisle page be the Carlisle (disambiguation) page? If5tatement (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Oppose just because it is 2000 years old doesn't mean it's an argument it should sit at the primary location. You haven't shown primarity over City of Carlisle. 65.93.12.8 (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Some local authorities that are named after their main settlements (Bradford, Oldham, Walsall and Chorley) have the settlement as the main topic and the district linked with a hatnote, others (Preston and Salford) have both disambiguated, and in some cases disambiguation is necessary for other reasons (such as Lancaster). There is nothing at Wikipedia:NCGN#England - maybe discussion is needed. Are any other topics on the disambiguation page significant enough? Peter E. James (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose for consistency with other "City of..." articles. (I think there are some arguments in favour of the move but the debate needs to be at a national level as it's not just Carlisle that's affected.)
    • Note: Misodoctakleidist (talk · contribs) attempted to preempt the result of this discussion by performing the move being debated. I believe I have undone what he/she did, and issued a user warning. (To add insult to injury the "move" was done as a copy-and-paste rather than a move.) -- Dr Greg  talk  19:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
      • I'm seeing a lot of districts which share their name with their major city like City of Carlisle. Yet there are relatively few which are disambiguated. So please explain how would it be consistent with other articles just because the district name begins with "City of"? When it comes down to it people searching for information on the administrative district should search for it specifically. The majority of people searching 'Carlisle' will be looking for information on the city, not a government entity it sits in. If5tatement (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose. There are too many other Carlisles (people and places, including the City of Carlisle) for this to direct to only one. Softlavender (talk) 11:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Surely the largest and most important should take precedence. Like so... London (disambiguation) Only one of the other 'Carlisle' locations has a population over 10,000. Most are under 5,000. Carlisle, Cumbria is of great historical importance, has a population over three times greater than the next highest on the list. If5tatement (talk)11:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Also once again, the 'City of Carlisle' is a 30 year old government entity, it should a sub topic of the Carlisle page. I really can't understand, if that is the reason, why the Carlisle page is disambiguated to prevent confusion with the government district it is in. The places in that district which are not Carlisle have their own pages and (take it from a resident of one of them) are not refereed to as being in Carlisle by the locals. It's called north east Cumbria, the name 'City of Carlisle' is used purely in a political context. If5tatement (talk) 11:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Put me down in support the next time this comes up. One side's editors may have been impolitic and overly hasty in resubmitting the votes above but, regardless, this page is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the other side's various editors' misunderstandings of that concept aside. (Of course I am also in support of merging the bizarre City of Carlisle page here as well, so that would clearly establish this as the primary topic in everyone's eyes.) — LlywelynII 09:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Curse

This really interests me and I'd like to hear more about it, especially since I actually am a Carlisle. RcSamurai — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.187.122 (talk) 06:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

I take the quoted text is an english translation of the original Scots version? Anyone got a lead on the Scots version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.128.33.248 (talk) 06:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Population debate

There seems to be an edit skirmish starting about Carlisle's population. The map at Visit Cumbria shows the county of Cumbria divided into large districts, one of which has the name "Carlisle". The map at the County Council shows the urban areas in Cumbria, one of which is also called "Carlisle". The urban area is much smaller than the wider district and therefore has a smaller population. This particular article is about the urban area so the smaller population figure is appropriate. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

City Flag/Coat of Arms

The Carlisle City Flag and Coat of Arms should be on this page like most cities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:D437:700:557D:84CE:8FA:76D1 (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

See City of Carlisle, but I don't know how the city differs from the district. --Northernhenge (talk) 19:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Yeah I think it should be on this page too, and the yellow city flag that flies over the old town hall & outside the civic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:D437:700:3810:285F:D5A2:C6F3 (talk) 22:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Does anyone know why this section keeps being deleted from the talk page? See this edit for example. Thanks --Northernhenge (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

It was my post that I deleted because of confusion between the settlement and district. I think the infobox is quite limiting and perhaps it should be changed to a settlement one. The settlement of Carlisle seems to be a city too but I'm not sure. A lot of information from the district page could be placed on to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:D437:700:6472:F4A2:8897:7374 (talk) 01:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
I understand the problem. Please see my post immediately above this one. This article is about the smaller urban area, not the larger district but the names are often confusing. It's unusual to delete material from a talk page - please see Wikipedia:TPO for guidelines. It's better to reply to a comment instead of deleting it. Thanks for your efforts --Northernhenge (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 20 August 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) The editor whose username is Z0 07:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

– This Carlisle is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in respect to long-term significance, it is the capital of Cumbria, a cathedral city and is the largest "official" city in England by area. It is also has around double the population of the others combined. In views [[2]] it and its sub topics have the lions share of the views. Carlisle, Pennsylvania (named after it) is the next most notable and can probably have a specific hatnote like Worcester. As noted at Talk:Salford#Requested move 12 August 2018 a topic may have several sub topics but the broadest meaning (the settlement) should be placed at the main space, people wanting the district or the football club will find them in the link. I'd point out that Hartwell previously had a primary topic even though one with over 44 times the population and not named after it exists, also Somerton had a primary topic even though there are larger ones. People searching for Carlisle Cullen or Kitty Carlisle would not expect to find those at "Carlisle" and the surname derives from this city[3]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

– Just noting this is at least the third time this has been discussed (see above) --Northernhenge (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lead image

In the grand scheme of things, the lead image in an article on a place as important as Carlisle may not be as important as good sourcing (there are currently only 17 references), but the first image people see in the article is still important. A dull image is off-putting, whereas an interesting one can make the read want to know more. Unfortunately, this image just doesn't do Carlisle justice. Recently an IP changed the lead image to a collage; it has merits as it incorporated several of the city's landmarks, but it probably needs to be discussed. Maybe there's a single shot on flickr that is distinctively Carlisle, or perhaps a better collage can be made? Nev1 (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

The present image does indeed look rather dull. The collage is much more appealing IMO. --Malleus Fatuorum 18:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I agree the current image is dull, but I don't like the idea of a collage either. Why squeeze lots of photos into an infobox, each image too small to see properly, when there is plenty of room to spread them out, at a larger size, throughout the article? -- Dr Greg  talk  19:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Definitely needs a collage! All other cities have them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:D437:700:557D:84CE:8FA:76D1 (talk) 01:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

I've created a photomontage which I think looks way better, feel free to improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:D437:700:9CCF:46E1:E831:3707 (talk) 13:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
I think I made it with the wrong template because I'm having trouble typing text for the images, a single image of the montage might be better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:D437:700:9CCF:46E1:E831:3707 (talk) 14:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

We can't have a pub be the lead image of Carlisle and collages are much more relevant these days. Could someone go round and take pictures of all the landmarks and put them into a collage like the Leeds page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:D03B:A000:FD63:B023:9D9:C324 (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Carlisle/Archive_1&oldid=1263409641"