Jump to content

Talk:Cape to Cairo Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alternate route?

[edit]

Assuming that German territory blocked a route via Tanzania, would a route via the friendly Belgian Congo be viable for the Cape-Cairo line?

Hello! It may have beentechnicallypossible since the Belgian Empire and the British Empire were allies. However, the logistical problems of the harsh vegetation and potential diseases, as opposed to the much easier terrain of German Tanganyika, would have made a route through modern Tanzania ideal. And if construction between upper Rhodesia (modern Zambia) and Kenya took place during the Great Depression, it might have been not economically feasible without the Tanzania territory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakzah (talkcontribs) 23:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cape to Cairo Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First Paragraph is False - not a good start

[edit]

"The Cape to Cairo Railway is a railway line that crosses Africa from south to north, being the largest and most important railroad of that continent. It serves as a link between Cape Town in South Africa and Port Said in Egypt.[1][2]" The first paragraph is extremely misleading, in fact completely untrue. This railway is/was a project which was nowhere near completed and there is no sign of it happening in the near future, so the first paragraph is wrong. "is", "being". "it serves" should be changed to something like "was planned to be", "would have been" and "would have served"

In fact the main box top right states: "Only a few stretches in operation" Ideally this article should be renamed to Cape to Cairo Railway Project.

Reference [1] is to a mining company's site which has a short paragraph about the Benguela railway from Angola to DRC, completely inadequate. Reference [2] does not exist.

Chris.Bristol (talk) 17:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Name of article and first paragraph changed as above

[edit]

Electrification

[edit]

The info box states the type of electrification used/planned. Is there any evidence for this? Chris.Bristol (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]