Talk:Can't Catch Me Now

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Can't Catch Me Now/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 03:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Hey there, it's been great to work together in the past and I will review this article today! --K. Peake 07:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I never did understand why it had to wait so long since it is quite a strong article, lol.--NØ 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: Yes it definitely is, although there are not many GA reviewers at the moment. I'm more than happy to have taken this on myself, always a pleasure to work with you! --K. Peake 09:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• "Rodrigo wrote it with" → "Rodrigo co-wrote the song with"
• ""Can't Catch Me Now" has lyrics" → "the song has lyrics"
• Pipe Music critics to Music journalism
• "The song received awards and nominations," → "The song received several awards and nominations,"
• ""Can't Catch Me Now" debuted at" → "the song debuted at"
• Wikilink music video
• Add a mention of Kelly Clarkson's cover version at the end since this is notable for the lead

Background

• Retitle to Background and release
• Img looks good mostly, although shouldn't it be aligned to the left per current overlap with the infobox?

• I've heard some people say an image should be on the side where the person in it faces the text, and a left placement here would create a slight MOS:SANDWICH

• First para looks good!
• [9] should be invoked after the "character work" quote instead of the end of the sentence
• Should the prose say movie or film character per this being American English?

• Seems like Americans have a preference for "movie character" based on a Google search, which is what is already used here.

• "playing a clip of" → "playing a short clip of" for full context
• Mention the date of the 7-inch vinyl release

Composition

• Retitle to Composition and lyrics
• Wikilink acoustic guitar on the audio sample text
• "Dan Nigro produced and" → "Nigro produced and"
• "bass, mellotron; Paul Cartwright" → "bass, and Mellotron; and Paul Cartwright"

• The "and" before Paul Cartwright would be unnecessary since Roan is the last item in the list.

• "Randy Merrill mastered it." → "Randy Merrill mastered the song."
• ""Coming like a storm into your town."" → ""Come in like a storm into your town"." per the source

• It's "coming" according to the official lyric video.

• "final lyric with "an open, unresolved cadence" according" → "final line with "an open, unresolved cadence", according"
• "they would not be captured by the latter:" this seems unclear; shouldn't it be something like "would not be able to capture them"?
• "Rodrigo then sings the lyric "Coming like a storm into your town"," → "Rodrigo then sings "Come in like a storm into your town","

Critical reception

• [34][8][35] should be in numerical order
• Re-invoke the American Songwriter ref at the end of the first sentence quoting this review
• "it also felt natural to her" → "it also felt natural of her" to avoid confusion here
• The NME ref should be invoked after "haunting" instead
• [28][8] should be in numerical order
• "and some others described the" → "and others described the"
• Make a separate sub-section for the accolades
• Add a comma after 96th Academy Awards

Commercial performance

• First para looks good!
• "received a gold certification in" → "received gold certifications in"

Music video

• Wikilink music video
• [34][32] should be in numerical order

Live performances and other usage

• Regarding the first live performance, add a mention of how Rodrigo introduced the song with her mention of its presence in the film

• Do you mean Rodrigo saying "So, has anybody watched The Hunger Games? I was super lucky because this year I got a chance to write a song for the movie that's out now"? I don't think it adds much to readers' understanding and we should probably try to be limited with how we use quotes.

• "reprised it on" → "reprised the song on"
• Shouldn't you mention the musicians and singers were in the shadows?
• [73][74] should both be invoked after the info on the performance setting but only [73] after the Billboard comments; same issue arises for Billboard at the Kelly Clarkson cover
• "included it on" → "included the song on"
• Add the mention of Clarkson's backing vocalist and instrumentalists

Credits and personnel

• Capitalize Mellotron

Charts

Weekly charts

• The archive url for the Austria chart does not display the song's position

Year-end charts

• Pipe UK Vinyl Singles to Official Vinyl Singles Chart

Certifications

• I cannot find the Polish certification on search

• It shows up on searching "Rodrigo" for me instead of the song name. But I am not sure how to change the notice in the template to reflect this.

Release history

• The United States release date is not backed up by the source

References

• Copyvio score looks pretty good at 32.4%; ignore the 62.5% since this is not matching with anything
• Ref 23 needs a publisher
• Add url-access registration to ref 27

• This one? I am able to access it without registration.

• What exactly makes Next Best Picture a reliable source on ref 42; it seems to solely consist of contributors?
• Star Tribune → Minnesota Star Tribune with the wikilink on ref 75

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; sorry this took until today, last minute plans came up yesterday! --K. Peake 09:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot for the speedy review, Kyle! I appreciate these even more given how bad it is at GAN nowadays... Everything should be addressed or have a reply now.--NØ 12:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

• @MaranoFan: Thanks for this response quickly yourself and that really means a lot, I am definitely honoured to have taken this on for ya!!! You still need to fix the instances using lyric where they should not be that I pointed out in the comp section, add registration to ref 27 since I am seeing that as a non subscriber and regarding the "Coming like" line, you should either change to "Come in like" per the source or add a note to reflect this is shown in the lyric video. Always nice to work with you of course! --K. Peake 20:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

• Thank you for highlighting these! All of the others should be fixed, but I can't add registration to ref 27 since I can see it without having to get a subscription. This parameter is supposed to indicate the least amount of effort a source can be viewed with, and this one is visible to some people without having to do anything so it should be left empty.--NØ 04:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, I will let ref 27 go since this is probably an issue for me as a UK resident accessing The New York Times! --K. Peake 07:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)