This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Cainta Church is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– (LMK if I've missed any beyond these four.) @The Anome, @Anißäb have been involved in renaming moves, but I object to the decision to retain their parenthetical locations. There are no other articles by these names, therefore the city names are false disambiguators, and names should be as short as possible considering that the new, full monikers are already comparatively unwieldy. Elizium23 (talk) 07:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.– robertsky (talk) 10:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.– robertsky (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as proposed. There are many parishes by these names. In general we do not have separate articles for churches and their parishes, so it may be taken as read that a Church of Our Lady of Light, St Joseph or St Mary Magdalene usually also has a parish by that name, as does the Church of San Ildefonso, Toledo. Just because Wikipedia does not have an exact article by that name is irrelevant in these circumstances. I should also point out that the Filipino articles are poorly named, as they are themselves primarily about the churches and not the parishes. The original moves were poorly conceived and should be reverted and better names come up with. These are parish churches, not parishes. I think there may be a bit of a failure in translation here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment There is a general consensus that the page moves as proposed would not move forward. However, relisting for consideration for the alternative proposal by JWilz12345, given that it had received a support by Howard the Duck:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
