Talk:CAN FD

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Logic

I don't think this makes sense:

"... since classic CAN[3] and CAN FD has been estimated to transmit data up to 30 times faster than classic CAN."

--Mortense (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

already resolved Schrauber5 (talk) 06:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

solved to that CAN FD can be up to 8 times higher than CAN with 1MBit/s -- Source: https://www.can-cia.org/can-knowledge/can/can-fd/ --GregorSun (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprecise

According to ISO 11898-1:2015 CAN-FD protocol for arbitration phase can use both base identifiers at 11 Bit and extended identifiers at 29 bits. The statement "CAN FD, the frame/message ID uses the 29-bits format used in the Extended ID version of classic CAN (Standard ID is 11 bits long)" is then not correct.

According this statement, is not clear if the provided formulas for bus load computation refer to 11 bit id or 29 bit IDs.

Also, the section CAN & CAN FD TP Headers is not relevant to the CAN-FD protocol, mixing the information of the two layers adds confusion to the topic. It is relevant to the ISO TP protocol over CAN-FD (ISO 15765-2) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.177.139.152 (talk) 07:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

solved: CAN FD can use 11bit or 28bit identifier: Source: https://www.can-cia.org/can-knowledge/can/can-fd/ --GregorSun (talk) 20:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]