Talk:Buttered cat paradox
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Buttered cat paradox article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-03-28. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-09-03. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
| Buttered cat paradox was featured in a WikiWorld cartoon. Click the image to the right for full size version. |  |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
"and butter-side-down on the floor in 81% of cases"
[edit]errr, nowhere in the linked article does it state 81%
19. ^Slater, Chris (2013-09-05). "(-Rav)/ t = R: Manchester boffins find formula for why toast lands butter side down". Manchester Evening News. Retrieved 2017-03-06.
prove me wrong 92.28.159.146 (talk) 11:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- This gives the 81% figure. This points out that what this was really about was promotion for the Big Bang Theory coming out on DVD. I can't find anything about Smith actually publishing this research. I suspect that it was only ever "published" as a press release. SpinningSpark 12:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Why was this unarchived? ~Anachronist (talk) 04:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)