Talk:Burning Shore Press
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Burning Shore Press article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reads like an advert
[edit]It should be noted that the article appears to have been created by an individual directly affiliated with the subject, which lends support to my interpretation that this is an advertisement. I will leave it up to others as to whether or not this meets the warrants for deletion. --Thisisbossi 07:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- This WAS created by someone affiliated with the site. But NOT as an advertisement. A book published by Burning Shore Press was mentioned in another entry and we were simply trying to give factual information to those who are interested.All information presented is accurate and we fail to see what the problem is (though we happily welcome anyone who would like to add information or improve the entry in anyway). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.133.54 (talk • contribs) 23:44, November 21, 2006
- In order to stay as an article on Wikipedia, a subject needs to prove "notability". Are there sources of information (aside from the publisher's own website) which prove that this company is "encyclopedic"? Has it been written up in newspaper or magazine articles? Has the company won any awards? See WP:CORP for more info. --Elonka 06:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)