Talk:Broughton-in-Furness

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

links to personal home pages such as GeoCities are not allowed please read the wiki rules about external links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_links

CCHT external link

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 10:06, 06 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 February 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Broughton-in-Furness → Broughton in Furness – Per the Ordnance Survey and road signs. The non-hyphonated version is also currently used in this article's text. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose — weak because some sources do indeed use the non-hyphenated form, but oppose because various others[1][2][3][4] retain the hyphens. While usage remains split, best not to re-title. ╠╣uw [talk] 10:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting that the 3rd source does use no hyphens in text ("Broughton in Furness CE Primary School") even though it uses them in the title. Vision of Britain uses no hyphens in the name of the title put the quote does use hyphens, maybe hyphens were more common in the past but old maps also don't show hyphens. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose: Where there's evidence for both hyphenated and non-hyphenated forms, my preference is to hyphenate to reduce ambiguity. In text, does "Broughton in Furness" mean a place called "Broughton" that is in Furness, or a place called "Broughton in Furness"? Hyphens remove that ambiguity. -- Dr Greg talk 12:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.