This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Actully yes, a book that was assigned to me for my Anthropology 111-A class; Anthropology The Exploration of Human Diversity Eleventh Edition by Conrad Phillip Kottak (who apparrently works/worked at the University of Michigan). In the first paragraph of chapter 10 it says:
"With glacial retreat, foragers pursued a more generalized economy, focusing less on large animals. This as the beginning of what Kent Flannery (1969) has called the broad-spectrum revolution. This refers to the period beginning around 15,000 B.P. in the Middle East and 12,000 B.P. in Europe, during which a wider rane, or broader spectrum, of plant and animal life was huntd, gathered, colledted, caught, and fished. It was revolutionary because, in the Middle East, it led to food production-human control over the reproduction of plants and animals."
Now My form of writing would be less `wordy', and I would change it to something like "It was 'seen' as revolutionary because..." to make it so that it is described as a fact and not an opinion.
P.S. That's only from one paragraph i.e. there's still the rest of that section that goes over the broad-spectrum theory along with the rest of the chapter that gives topics that are related to this.--The King of the Hippies10:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have any evidence for this? The whole article is badly in need of some references and citations. Is this just someone's theory? Whose? m.e.05:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it would be a good point to point out that this was a `switch' into the domestication of plants and animals from our previous roaming and scavaging. (I'm not 100% sure on the `what we were doing before then' part though)