Talk:British Beer and Pub Association

Beer Low‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics, people

The BBPA website states "over half of the nations 54,000 pubs" - not two thirds

Enterprise and punch taverns lease out approximately 15000 pubs between them Admiral taverns over 2000 leased pubs, Greene king pub partners leases out approx 1400 pubs, S&NPE leases out over 2000 pubs, Marstons leases out over 1700 pubs - So from the 6 biggest pubcos thats over 22100 pubs leased out to independant operators - which (by my maths) is a large proportion of over 27,000.

All figures above taken from the relevant company websites or through trade press releases from the said member companies - Therefore the changes I made are not assumptions. However {theessexenquirer} I can see your point ref assumptions, if you are looking for me to provide verifiable links through this stub to the figures I have just quoted - happy to do so if that is what you want. I'm also open to your input on possible alternative alterations.

Pousis Pousis (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Having reviewed the BBPA website, it is accurate to refer to over half, I have amended as such. I will accept your figures as a given, however do not believe they justify your point. The representation of numerous directly managed/operated pubs also hold a significant portion of the membership. I believe that actually providing this additional information in the introductory sentence is both confusing and unnecessary.

If you can demonstrate a notable benefit to improving the quality of information, I will concede the point, but given earlier malicious attacks on this page it seems prudent to play it safe. As it is clear that the owners of these pubs are paying for the pubs to be represented, even if, as you state, the operator has little or no involvement, the point is moot.

Theessexenquirer (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't see your amendment to "over half" so I have just done that.

I disagree with the involvement part of the operator and think that it does make a difference for clarity - as a leasehold is the purchase of the use of building for a period of time, with no interference on the part of a landlord, Ne'er mind we could go round in circles on that. Having said that playing safe is no bad thing - especially given the vitriol of one or two of the bits of vandalism - however that doesn't mean that all change is bad just because it is not the status quo.

Pousis (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that amend, my apologies I did not make it.

Theessexenquirer (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]