Talk:Brinkmanship (Cold War)

How come there is nothing under Arms Race? There are many sublevels, but no text.70.246.155.31 (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a class project... obviously some members of the class didn't fulfill their jobs and thus parts of it are empty. Feel free to fill those empty parts if you want ^^. DarkResin (talk) 11:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal with Brinkmanship

I would like to propose the merger of this article with the Brinkmanship one. Both articles were written about the same concept. Since this one is a historical perspective of the diplomatic tactic, it could be integrated into the general one. HumanCapacitator (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think that merging them would be best. Making it a subsection under the regular Brinksmanship article. Sherlockiain (talk) 21:39, 25 April 2016 (CST)

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

There is a strange line in the article: "However, the esteban crisis they found no solution (...)" which suggest accidental editing or possible vandalism. 78.23.27.59 (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brinkmanship (Cold War). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]