Talk:Bring It On (film)

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

Excuse me, what's the Point in linkin the movie's main characters? Neither of them is (as far as I'm concerned) an iconic figure deserving (or having) an own article. Plus, the nice page is all red now. Not good. --5amsara 16:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC) Um...I wasn't aware that being an 'icon' was a requirement for an article. Kirsten Dusnst and Eliza Dushku are both very established Actors who have appeared extensivly in Film and Television.[reply]

Also, Darcy's name is not Judith Darcy. I think someone put that in because of the opening scene where she say's 'Dude it's Darcy!', not Judith Darcy.

Fair use rationale for Image:Bringitonmovieposter.jpg

Image:Bringitonmovieposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Trend

Did this film start the trend that resulted in people smiling with their mouths wide open and their noses wrinkled? I see it everywhere.Lestrade (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Major edit of plot

I've just made some very heavy edits to the plot section, which was massive and way too detailed. I've left the banner up, it would be great it others could chip in and edit it. It could still use some paring down. --206.248.156.120 (talk) 00:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The line "It is based on the true story of Dariusz Augustynowicz" appears in the article for the film Crank, also. Added by an anonymous contributor/vandal a couple edits ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.229.139 (talk) 02:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Musical numbers

I deleted the "Musical numbers" section (added on Nov 10, 2010) because it was not referenced. The soundtrack listing at [[1]] does not show any of the songs that were on the list (except for "Mickey"). Furthermore, generally, a film does not have an "Act 1" and "Act 2" (I have not seen this film).JeanColumbia (talk) 14:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Popular with critics?

The page currently contains the statement:

Though popular with critics, including Roger Ebert who called it the "Citizen Kane" of cheerleading movies, it was not at the time considered a serious film by critics or audiences.

The "popular with critics" bit has me scratching my head. The Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer only gives it a 56% score from top critics and 64% for all critics, and the Ebert quote appears to be a tongue-in-cheek comment in his Fired Up review - his Bring It On review doesn't indicate he liked it much, and he only gave it two stars. 220.233.68.106 (talk)

"Bring it On" synonymous to cheer leading?

The article mentions "Outside of the United States, American-style cheerleading is sometimes referred to as Bring It On-style cheer leading.". the source of this information does not prove or even mentions this bizarre statement. I am not used to correcting wikipedia pages, please remove this line if you know what you are doing 37.106.108.136 (talk) 01:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bring It On (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101204055606/http://www.alliancetheatre.org/en/Our-Plays/Later-This-Season/Bring-It-On.aspx to http://www.alliancetheatre.org/en/Our-Plays/Later-This-Season/Bring-It-On.aspx
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.playbillvault.com/Show/Detail/13953/Bring-It-On-The-MusicalThe
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.reel.com/reel.asp?node=features/interviews/reed

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]