This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The text says "Even though" Brewster's windshield design wasn't coprighted, it was imitated. I've changed "copyrighted" to "patented" because innovations in parts are subject to patent, not copyright in the U.S., but I think the words "Even though" should be changed to "Because." If the windshield innovation had been patented and was copied, that would deserve an "even though." But since the widnshield design wasn't protected, "because" is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C50:147F:FA35:3134:82A6:7E1E:A741 (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Even though" means "Despite." That is clearly wrong. If something isn't protected by trademark, copyright or patent, you can use it because there is no protection, not "despite" the fact there is no protection. Sterngard (talk) 17:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]