Talk:Bouïra
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bouïra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bouïra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303175036/http://www.populstat.info/Africa/algeriat.htm to http://www.populstat.info/Africa/algeriat.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]@Noname JR: With regard to this [edit: Is there a link between the two official languages and the easily attributable content that you removed? And why are you insisting on adding original research to the article (despite being asked not to)? M.Bitton (talk) 21:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
As for for your latest edit: 1) You ought to know that Siwel.info is not a reliable source. 2) The fact that you're reduced to scrapping the bottom of the barrel to find a source for that made-up name (while questioning the Arabic name, which is attributable to thousands of reliable sources) should also tell you something. M.Bitton (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)