Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1

GA Review

Passed — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 14:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 13:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 13:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Apologies for the late review! A nice article overall with some issues that can be easily addressed:

Lead & Infobox

Add a comma after "with the song "Thunder and Lightning""

Everything else is good with the lead and infobox.

Background

Refs #1 and #2 checked – both are reliable and have appropriate information about the sentences they're cited for. No MOS issues in this section either.

Before Eurovision

Link Oslo
Ref #6 doesn't support the sentence it's cited for
Neither Ref #8 nor #9 mention "BHRT Studio A" or it being held in Sarajevo.
Ref #12' URL opens the main page of the website
Ref #11 only supports Rybak's appearance in the show, the rest are unsourced (I imagine they were cited in Ref #12, which doesn't work).

Refs #3, #4, #5, #7, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19 all checked and fine.

At Eurovision

Unlink Oslo as it should be linked in Before Eurovision section
1-8 -> 1–8 (en dash instead of a hyphen)

Refs #20–#37 checked – all are reliable and have appropriate information about the sentences they're cited for.

Conclusion

No issues with plagiarism (9.1% per Earwig's copyvio detector). All three used images in the article are free. No major issues with MOS and sourcing. @Grk1011: Ready to pass once you've addressed the above issues. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 08:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Golden: I believe I addressed your concerns. I also added a small bit more that I discovered while trying to track down some supplemental refs. Thanks for the review! Grk1011 (talk) 14:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grk1011: Excellent, all points adequately addressed. Happy to pass. Congratulations! — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 14:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.