Talk:Bone-anchored hearing aid
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bone-anchored hearing aid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Clear distinction needed between proprietary and general
[edit]This article needs some rewrite to address the subject not in terms of specific brands but in terms of "bone anchored hearing aids" as a general topic. Certainly some discussion of particular examples and various types is needed but the branding needs to be removed almost entirely. - - MrBill3 (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Imo, what this article really needs, more than any of the other issues, is a reliable, independent source to actually tell the reader if they are better than other types of hearing aid. 188.30.205.212 (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think what type of hearing aid is better should be a primary aim of this article. It should give the information about the subject. If reliable medical references make an evaluation of what type of hearing aid is better than another that information should certainly be included. I suspect there are advantages and disadvantages to various types as well as conditions and or situations for which one type is better not a one is better than another. - - MrBill3 (talk) 06:54, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
COI tag
[edit]The number of connected contibututors on this article is unbelievable. Don't have time to review everything now but this looks to the way WP:PROMO. Jytdog (talk) 03:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Cochlear damage
[edit]The eardrum and the small bones in the healthy middle ear transmit the sound vibrations, and small muscles quick enough to react to thunder (but not to explosions) attached to these, adjust the amount of vibrations to the cochlea. One could say that the middle ear is a kind of control mechanism for protecting nerves in the inner ear against naturally occurring sudden loud noises. Since bone conduction skips this control function, it would be nice to discuss how the different implant technologies protect the inner ear. Can anybody contribute? Cobanyastigi (talk) 07:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- I would guess that volume limiting is implicit in the design. The amplifier will simply clip the output at excessive sound levels, although designing in compression would be a trivial exercise. Stub Mandrel (talk) 07:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bone-anchored hearing aid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140503101146/http://ww.annals.com/toc/auto_article_process.php?year=2005&page=1&id=14999&sn=195 to http://ww.annals.com/toc/auto_article_process.php?year=2005&page=1&id=14999&sn=195
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)