Talk:Bolognese sauce

Initial comments

I've marked this for cleanup as it seems to have been written by a fourteen year old. In particular the section on Spaghetti Bolognaise.. 88.110.36.228 17:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I can't seriously believe that british students know how to make real ragu`... if they're inept at cooking, they're probably not doing ragu` right either.

• Don't be biashed :P -- SoothingR 21:36, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• I'd suspect they're thinking more of the tomato based fake bolognese instant-sauce than the real thing. Making a proper ragout requires a little more expertise. — Ashmodai ^{(talk · contribs)} 06:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Spaghetti bolognese is ancient, well-traveled and widely interpreted. Why on earth should this television chef Heston have a dedicated section to his own take on it? Clearly he's not making Spaghetti bolognese anymore if he's adding fish sauce, tarragon and Worcestershire sauce! Can this be replaced by a section on various interpretations of Spaghetti bolognese worldwide? More interesting and relevant than the silly ideas of one minor celeb from a non-food nation. Mahlzeitgeist (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I'd agree with adding more interpretations, but frankly, I think you're trolling given your description of Blumenthal as a "minor celeb" and the UK as a "non-food nation". 19:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I believe the section on Blumenthal's "version" has little relevance on this page. They are no more Bolognese sauce than vodka and grapefruit juice is a Screwdriver. (Tho his trick of adding star anise to deepen the meat flavor is kind of cool--I'm gonna steal that for other applications..) Recommend deleting.

--afn33282 4:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I hardly think spaghetti bolognese has an ancient history, spaghetti is never used with a ragu (note ragu, not ragout).

Misconceptions

In the United States it can be hard to find authentic ragu bolognese. This leads to many misconceptions. Here are my comments:

For more information, the canonical reference on ragu bolognese is The Splendid Table by Lynne Rossetto Kasper.

It is not made from ground meat. The meat should be finely minced. This important difference has two consequences:

• The texture is different, and
• If the home cook buys pre-ground meat at the supermarket, it is likely to be too fatty and lead to a greasy ragu.

Certainly, one can use ground meat as a shortcut, but it should be recognized as such -- it really does make a big difference in the final product!

This is a meat sauce, not a tomato sauce. I'm not just trying to be pedantic here. The amount of tomato in authenic bolognese is very small: maybe a 1/4 cup of tomato sauce or a couple of tablespoons of tomato paste.

tilthouse 18:43, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I have also removed the garlic since this is not present in the recipe: for a recipe very close to the tradition see the it:Ragù bolognese. --Biopresto 07:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

hmm as a british student i have to point out thats its spag bog not spag bol.

As an equally british person I would point out that I have NEVER heard the term Spag Bog but have frequentely heard it described as Spag Bol, in day to day life and in the media. CartmanUK26 13:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Hmm... yes. I agree with CartmanUK26 (the latest in a long line of CartmanUKs). I didn't notice this discussion the other day when I created the section below. Oh well. --Dreaded Walrus 07:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Have to agree as well, I've only ever heard spag bol. Spag bog sounds like a symptom suffered the next day if the spag bol was bad. eyeball226 (talk) 16:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to add that the canonical reference is not the aformentioned text, but rather the Italian Academy of Cuisine. The recipe can be found at this URL and calls not for ground beef, but cartella, which is skirt steak. The chef would slice the steak in thin strips to prepare it for cooking. http://www.itchefs-gvci.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=587&Itemid=976 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.197.186 (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Ground beef versus minced beef

So what is the difference between ground beef and minced beef ? 198.144.208.148 02:28, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Think about the difference between a hamburger patty from McDonnalds (barely resembling meat as it has been so pureed) and steak that has been fed through a mincer and extruded.

The authentic Bolognese recipe calls for 250g of Cartella. Cartella is known in the US and UK as 'skirt steak'. Skirt steak is neither beef mince, nor ground beef, both of which are effectively the same thing: cuts of meat put through a grinder. Skirt steak is a grainy cut of beef, which when sliced thinly across the grain, will collapse of its own in the cooking process (about 2 hours simmering time). The key is that it must be cut across the grain, and very thinly. This will produce strips of beef which which because they are held together by fat and connective tissue will fall apart in the cooking and give a very tender, very 'buttery' effect. Having prepared this dish both ways, I can vouch that the original recipe, calling for cartella is much superior. Skirt steak is not an expensive cut of beef, and though there's a little more effort involved in the preparation, it is worth the trouble. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.197.186 (talk) 12:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The meat must be ground to twice the size of a hamburger!!!!! that is very important. So let us not mix up pasta with meat sauce and pasta Alla Bolognese. Furthermore the pasta (noodles as some Anglophones prefer to call it) must be made from "egg". You can substitute but then you are not sticking with the true original recipe. pinoremaxPinoremax (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

picture

Are there any other available pictures? I don't know many Italians who serve the dish without mixing the pasta and sauce together before serving it. I don't really know how to find applicable pictures without violating copyright laws, but someone must.

One day or the other I'll try to do a nice picture, I eat it very often, the point is to use a nice pot for a good looking picture. --Biopresto 18:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

How about this one?: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Fettuccine_al_rag%C3%B9_modified.JPG
-- ZZyXx 17:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

"Spag Bog"

The article mentioned that in the UK Spaghetti Bolognese "is known as Spag Bol or Spag Bog". I changed that to "is sometimes known as", as it is still usually known as Spaghetti Bolognese in my own experience. I also removed Spag Bog, as not only had I not heard of it, but it seems relatively uncommon when compared with "Spag Bol". --Dreaded Walrus 20:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Ola

I put spag bog back - it's definitely used a lot in the UK, from my geordie dad to my cockney mum.

It seems to have gone again in the interim, but I've restored spag bog as it is definitely idiomatic in the UK. Ericoides (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

And it's just gone again as "uncited nonsense", so I've added it back with a dictionary source. The name is used in parts of the UK and Australia, and a Google News or Book search turns up a few mentions. --McGeddon (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

It definitely is NOT known as 'Spag bog' anywhere. That is just idiotic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.8.91 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 8 August 2014‎

Except we have a source saying otherwise. Dialect words can be surprising, but that doesn't mean that they don't exist. --McGeddon (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Spag bog is definitely a term that exists. Its use outside of Australia and New Zealand may be limited though. I have found references to it in an Australian web article referencing a British tv show in the 70’s (it’s not clear on exactly what episode of what show though) and an article about an Australian TV episode that aired in 2016. Given the information mentioned, I believe Spag Bog should be re-added to the article rufioh^talk_sign 02:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

I removed it because it is inveterate garbage. If you have some sort of SOURCE that shows it is a real term, we can talk. But saying it’s “know colloquially” as that is useless. I am an Italian teacher and native of Metro New York and no one I know has heard that term. It smacks of English North Country cut slang. So prove it. Alexandermoir (talk) 08:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

What an odd comment. I'm not sure what being an Italian teacher in New York has to do with knowing UK or Australian English terms. --Cyllel (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Accademia Italiana della Cucina

The original recipe contains red wine, not white. 217.162.119.127 (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

deeling

kiohuhu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.4.190 (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Which sort of wine?

The intro says the recipe traditionally uses red wine. The modern interpretations section says that white wine is traditionally used, not red. Which is it? --Irrevenant [ talk ] 00:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Traditionally, red wine would go into the sauce, while white would be drank with the meal. Contemporarily, especially in North America, whatever the diner's preference is, is fine and often neither are put into the sauce when prepared. Consider though that the recipe did not originate in North America. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.244.212.5 (talk) 02:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

The original recipe calls for Red or White. The biggest difference is likely to be in the color that is imparted by red vs white. I can vouch that both produce an excellent result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.197.186 (talk) 12:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Inconsistent spelling

Which is the correct spelling, "spaghetti bolognese" or "spaghetti Bolognese"? That is what I wanted to find out from this article, but unfortunately it is inconsistent regarding the capitalization. 78.133.122.211 (talk) 09:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

As far as I can see, it's capitalised if it's referring to the traditional ragu, but lowercase if it's referring to the slop that you can buy in a jar :) Thedarxide (talk) 10:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually the correct term is "[spaghetti] alla Bolognese" that means "the Bolognese way, referring to the city of Bologna in Emilia Romagna. In fact most pasta dishes are described in this fashion eg. spaghetti alla carbonara, bucatini all'Amatriciana, penne all'arrabbiata, and so on. In the case of the Bolognese sauce, the spelling requires a capital letter since in Italian names of cities and adjectives derived therefrom require a capital letter. Although one frequently, especially outside of Italy, comes across spaghetti or fettuccine alla Bolognese, this sauce is traditionally associated only with tagliatelle or lasagna. carlosdiz --Carlosdiz (talk) 03:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Carlosdiz (talk) 03:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Australia / New Zealand Tuesday night spaghetti tradition

Can anyone cite any evidence of this "tradition" or is it just hearsay? I live in New Zealand and I have never heard any mention it. Even if it exists it must be relatively uncommon and probably not worth a mention in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.126.194.81 (talk) 23:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I live in australia and it caught my eye also, as I've never heard of anyone practicing this supposed tradition before in my life. 121.223.243.95 (talk) 07:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Likewise. The only Tuesday tradition that I know about is Cheap Pizza Tuesday when the two main pizza chains drop their prices. --MichaelGG (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I've lived in Australia for 20 years and I was introduced to this tradition by my grandmother. Since then, I've had spaghetti every possible Tuesday. So, that's some evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.69.234 (talk) 09:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I concur. This is an established practice in my family and among those I grew up with. I imagine scholastic evidence can be found without great difficulty. 203.213.105.179 (talk) 10:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Belgian origin of Bolognese

In the late 70s I remember talking to an older "mama" (Italian mum) who had immigrated to Belgium in the early 50s. The lady was known as a formidable cook and an authority on Italian dishes & sauces.

She claimed it was a group of Italian immigrants living in Belgian coal mining region who invented the Bolognese sauce from ingredients they had lying around. The sauce was cheap, quick & easy to make, which is why it became quickly popular amongst the Italian immigrant population in Belgium, who later spread the cheap recipe among lots of other Italian mining immigrant families around the world. A few of the "original" cooks came from Bologna, and decided to dedicate the sauce because unlike Napolitana (Naples) & Romana (Rome) Bologna didn't have its own (signature) sauce at that time.

Problem is that the lady in question died about 15 years ago, none of this was written down and the story can only be corroborated by people who have known the lady and heard her stories (and tasted her food). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.177.73.74 (talk) 18:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Sir, but the story is unreal! The "Ragù alla Bolognese" is not cheap, nor quick nor easy to make. Italians are great story tellers, expatriates particularly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.34.75.116 (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm a quarter Belgian, my family are cooks (uncle was one of Trompetto's team at the Savoy in London) and it's nowhere in any family recipe book. The Mayor of Bologna is currently repeating the persistent denials that it had anything to do with his town. Amd most importantly, it lacks the herbs so typical of Italian cookery. On the other hand, in it's purest form, it is very paesano: tomatoes, meat, onions at the simplest. Then wine and garlic, if you must. But a docker in Immingham is likely to have as simple a taste as one in Imola - and vice versa.

What may be to the point is my memory of it as a recipe on the original packs of spaghetti in the UK in the 1960s - it might therefore be worth checking with Robert Opie's Museum of Packaging. Certainly, those were handmade spaghetti, in packets 500cm long - not the shorter machine-cut we get today. Ah, but then I might have ended up running Camisa - Madonna was an admirer (and still seems to be). And the recipe was in English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.249.78.216 (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

You are talking about Spaghetti bolognese? There is a traditional Bolognese sauce (neither eaten with Spaghetti nor based on tomatoes 🍅 😋 😉 😜 😀 😄 🍅 😋 😉 😜 😀 😄 🍅 😋) 78.34.100.62 (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Contradiction

The article contradicts itself numerous times about the traditional ingredients mentioned by the Academia della Cucina. At one point it says one list of ingredients, but later, a recipe said to be from the same source lists a different set. Can someone who speaks Italian check what the Academia says and edit this please? 109.246.1.175 (talk) 21:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Also, this page mentions that bolognese sauce "is customarily used to dress "tagliatelle al ragù"", however it seems that the 'official' Tagliatelle al Ragù has a totally different sauce - Bolognese sauce (includes beef & white wine) VS Sauce for Tagliatelle al Ragù (includes chicken & red wine)

Both are recipees from Accademia Italiana della Cucina.

Nforde (talk) 01:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

The "ragù" is a type of sauce with meat. You can make also with chicken but Italians usually doesn't use the chicken in their ragù. They dress many different type of pasta (spaghetti, tagliatelle, fetuccine, lasagne) with ragù. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.149.244.31 (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

French?

Why does the name have to be in French as well as Italian on the first line, surely because it is an Italian dish only Italian is needed? Or is this a stupid question? Hamilton365 (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I think it should be removed because it is a bit unnecessary, if noone has any objections i will remove it Hamilton365 (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Corrections Needed & Some Facts

1. Under the section "Tradition and origins", the first sentence, "The sauce dates back at least to the 5th century.", is just plain wrong and should be removed. This article is about a sauce for pasta in the style of Bologna, and pasta did not exist in any part of what is now Italy in the 5th century. The history of fresh pasta in northern Italy is obscure, but is generally thought to date to the 14th-15th centuries (Oretta Zanini De Vita, Encyclopedia of Pasta University of California Press,ISBN 978-0-520-25522-7). Bologna's first pasta factory was chartered by the city council in November, 1586 (ref: Lynne Rossetto Kasper, The Splendid Table ISBN 0-688-08963-1).

2. While a number of pasta dishes of various types were served with meat broths from the middle ages through the early modern era, sauces incorporating meat were generally unknown until the late 18the century. The first documented meat sauce for pasta identified as a ragu dates to this period, and was from Alberto Alvisi, cook to the Cardinal of Imola, near Bologna (ref: Lynne Rossetto Kasper, The Splendid Table). Meat sauces (ragus) then grew in popularity through the first half of the 19th century. The first published recipe for a pasta with a meat sauce identified as Bolognese was from chef Pellegrino Artusi, dated to the mid 19th century and included in his cookbook published in 1891 (ref: Science in the Kitchen and the Art of Eating Well (English translation), recipe 87, ISBN 0-8020-8704-3 ). Artusi's recipe, Maccheroni alla Bolognese, is similar in construction to the recipe Il classico Ragù alla Bolognese secondo l’Accademia Italiana della Cucina, but used veal rather than beef, and no wine or tomato (tomatoes did not into widespread use in cooking in northern Italy until the latter half of the 19th century). Artusi did state when, "the sauce is completely done, you can add as a final touch half a glass of cream - this will make an even more delicate dish". Artusi called for fresh maccheroni (a then generic term for pasta) made from durum wheat flour rather than today's customary egg and flour Tagliatelle, although Tagliatelle was well known and used in the region in Artusi's time, and is called for in a number of his other recipes.

3. A revised (second) recipe from l'Accademia Italiana della Cucina is to be included in a forthcoming of their compendium of recipes La Cucina, (personal communication from Paolo Petroni, Secretary General of l'Accademia). This version in Italian can be seen here, with one minor detail not yet corrected - the wine will be specified as "Vino bianco secco", dry white wine. By that recipe the beef should be from what in the U.S. is the plate section, and the most preferred cut is what is known in the U.S. as hanger steak, known in Bologna as "faint folder". However, due to the very limited amount and availability of that cut, the similar and more readily available skirt steak in the U.S. is widely used (both are from the Plate section of beef). The pancetta distesa called for is understood by some to mean fresh bacon or side pork, not the familiar salt cured and rolled pancetta. A video demonstration from in Italian of the preparation according to l'Accademia can be seen here

4. A previous Talk entry by tilthouse (November 2005) took issue with ground versus minced meat. A literal translation can be minced, but also includes "chopped" and "ground". With modern equipment coarsely ground beef is generally used by all chefs.

5. The section titled "International Day of Italian Cuisines", should mention and reference the sponsoring organization, Grouppo Virtuale Cuochi Italiani (GVCI, Virtual Group of Italian Chefs). The GVCI press release can be found here. For that worldwide event the recommended recipe was not that of l’Accademia Italiana della Cucina but was provided by GVCI President Mario Caramella, as seen here

TXEB (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Update 3/2/2012: I made changes consistent with 1. and 2. above. TXEB (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Great work!

The recipe probably shouldn't be included in the article per WP:NOTHOWTO. Since the article already uses the recipe as a source elsewhere, it's fairly redundant as well. --Ronz (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Update 3/2/2012 - more editing, including adding a section on evolution and varations, consolidated the entries on "Accademia into its own section, added more references, and cleaned up the Further Reading section TXEB (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Accademia Italiana della Cucina - Round 2

I tend to agree with Ronz that the recipe from l'Accademia Italiana della Cucina should not be reproduced in Wikipedia. While it is has become a bit of a standard, it is no more "authentic" than any of the other sources referenced. My only reservation with deleting at this time is that it is not yet available from l'Accademia's own sources -- the referenced source is actually a website of a professional chef's group (GVCI). I did receive a personal communication (email) from the Secretary General of l'Acceademia that the recipe listed is authentic, and that it is scheduled to be included both in an upcoming revision to their web accessible database and in a forthcoming revision to La Cucina. Since it is a standard and is currently available only from a secondary source, I would favor keeping the recipe until l'Accademia has it available directly either from their website or a new edition of La Cucina. What say ye ? --TXEB (talk) 02:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for discussing this further. I'd removed it before seeing this response, given my concerns above (20:53, 2 March 2012) - WP:NOTHOWTO and the fact that the recipe is included elsewhere as a reference. I've restored it to make this discussion easier.

Given that it is a reference, why the need for the recipe? --Ronz (talk) 16:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

After some thought (and more editing) I concur - it should be removed. Go for it! --TXEB (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Done ! TXEB (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Once both recipes are published on the Accademia site, they should both be referenced. The paradox of an update to a traditional recipe by a self appointed custodian is of historical and academic interest.

It was useful to publish the recipe on wikipedia, since not everyone would be able to translate Italian and would understand soffritto and cartella of skirt/plate. Ingredients such as the "panna di cottura di un litro di latte intero" are uncommon outside of Italy (or at least Italian communities) and therefore deserve some explanation to assist the budding bolognese enthusiast. Wikipedia seems like the best place to clarify the translation(s) of the two recipes, since there is no authoritative English translation. If one did not speak Italian, a person would struggle to understand the ingredients list and would be unable to recreate the authentic recipe.

My take on it is that anything that encourages people to make a meat-based rather than sugary tomato-based ragu is a GoodThing(TM)

Lead image and the Spag Bol redirect

I've moved an image of (so-called) "spaghetti bolognese" out of the lead and into the Spaghetti Bolognese section at the foot of the page. The main subject of this page is clearly Bolognese sauce, ie ragù alla bolognese. That sauce itself has nothing to do with spaghetti: as the lead correctly states, It is customarily used to dress tagliatelle and may also be used to prepare "lasagne alla bolognese".

I would also suggest rerouting the Spaghetti Bolognese and Spag Bol redirects to Bolognese_sauce#Spaghetti_Bolognese.

—MistyMorn (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Good catch! --Ronz (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Three redirects done (and duly noted). —MistyMorn (talk) 18:55, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

List of common misconceptions?

I have proposed misconception/s outlined on the present page for inclusion: please see Talk:List of common misconceptions#Spaghetti bolognese. —MistyMorn (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Now available at: Talk:List of common misconceptions/Archive 17#Spaghetti bolognese. JIP | Talk 07:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Duplicated line in top paragraph and 'Evolution and Variations'

I noticed a duplicate line that should probably be changed. The very first paragraph has a sentence that says: Genuine ragù alla bolognese is a complex sauce which involves slow cooking using a variety of techniques, including sweating, sautéing and braising.

The line is virtually repeated in the fourth paragraph in the section 'Evolution and Variations': Ragù alla bolognese is a complex sauce which involves a variety of cooking techniques, including sweating, sautéing and braising.68.12.225.100 (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. But the repetition is there because the opening lead section provides a brief summary of the main article. Maybe the lead could say it a bit more simply though... 81.147.165.192 (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Bolognese sauce

It's not true! The so-called "spaghetti bolognese" is the most typical dish of spaghetti in the Italia cousin just after the "spaghetti al pomodoro" dish! It's called "spaghetti al ragù" and they eat it instead of the spaghetti with meatballs dish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.149.244.31 (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bolognese sauce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100913005933/http://www.accademiaitalianacucina.it:80/en_index.php to http://www.accademiaitalianacucina.it/en_index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bolognese sauce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.gvci.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=572&Itemid=975
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120915102559/http://www.newsfood.com/q/44376a8e/tagliatelle-con-rag-alla-bolognese-parte-1-il-rag/ to http://www.newsfood.com/q/44376a8e/tagliatelle-con-rag-alla-bolognese-parte-1-il-rag/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.accademiaitalianacucina.it/en_index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Enciclopedic value of International Day of Italian Cuisines 2010

I wonder if the subsection titled "International Day of Italian Cuisines 2010" could be removed. I think it conveys information about a specific episode of an event that does not seem to be particularly encyclopedic but rather anecdotal. There are hundreds of such culinary events, not sure what that adds to the understanding of the sauce... Any views?--Desyman (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Bolognese does not translate to 'meatsauce'

Looks like there has been some tampering with the article? The first sentence is nonsense, 'bolog' is not italian for meat and there was no Pope Holubius VII.--138.246.3.137 (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Edit by user:Popcornfud on "traditional" and "genuine"

This edit has been made (and - when reverted - reinstated) by @Popcornfud. The guidelines on reverting mention that if you make an edit that is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit – leave the status quo up, or try an alternative way to make the change that includes feedback from the other editor. I therefore partially reverted to the status quo ante and open this discussion.

• No objection from my side in removing "genuine". I honestly do not see any issue with this, I do not find it POV since it is a simple statement of a fact (in Italy we do not serve spaghetti with large amounts of sauce), plus the sentence says that "it may be". However, the sentence is clear also without genuine.
• I do however object to the removal of the sentence indicating that this is not common to the Bolognese tradition. As any user familiar with the complexity of Italian food culture would be aware, Italian cuisine is extremely regionalized, if not even provincialized. This means that one cannot simply apply the transitive property to something in a local cuisine by extension to the entire Italian one (which, de facto, is an "agglomeration" of multiple local food traditions). This is particularly the case in this instance: on the one hand in Bologna, the place of origin of ragù (in English Bolognese sauce), it is not considered traditional (and to many not even acceptable) to serve it with spaghetti (which is a southern type of pasta). On the other hand, even when it may occasionally be found in combination with spaghetti in parts of the country where the dish is not traditional, it nevertheless remains foreign "even" to traditional cuisine of those regions.

I hope the above can facilitate a consensus on the wording of the sentence. As long as the discussion is ongoing, I kindly ask to stick to the above-mentioned guidelines: During a dispute discussion, you should not revert away from the status quo ante bellum until a consensus is established. Thank you! Desyman (talk) 16:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for making the discussion.

1) The issue with "genuine" is that it's a loaded word. It presupposes that there is such a thing as a "genuine" or "true" version of a dish, which doesn't easily apply to subjective, unscientific things like cuisine — how do you measure that? It also implies that any other version of the dish is therefore somehow "fake" or some sort of an imposter. It is safer, and just as clear IMO, to simply say that the dish originated in Italy and that the Italian version differs from other versions. It's also fine to report the opinions of sources on the matter, as long as it isn't presented factually in Wikipedia's voice.

2) I understand, but I think you're missing the big picture here. If we say this food doesn't really exist in Italy, then it logically follows that it doesn't exist in Bologna, because Bologna is in Italy. Readers won't be confused about this, or wonder if Bologna is an exception, unless we say otherwise.

As an aside, it looks to me like the sources used on this matter could be a lot better. All of this is kind of moot without strong sourcing. Here's a Guardian article that might be useful, to start with: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2016/oct/11/spag-bol-and-other-crimes-against-ragu-alla-bolognese Popcornfud (talk) 17:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Here's another source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/10/spaghetti-bolognese-is-ruined-by-the-british-top-italian-chef-an/ Popcornfud (talk) 17:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay in replying, real life got in the way!

1. While I think this point can be closed, I do wish to make a small point here. While fully agreeing that cuisine is in general - like most elements of culture - a fluid concept, there are some facts that can easily be verified in practice, making a given statement true or false. The fact that normally the amount of sauce used in Italian cuisine is more modest than in most of its imitations abroad is a rather factual issue. But again, the meaning is conveyed also without the term "genuine" so let's leave it out as you suggest.
2. The point I was trying to make before is precisely that a "big picture" approach - which I see rather as superficiality, caused by limited familiarity with the intricacies of Italian food culture - fails to grasp its highly regionalized nature. Which is why I would not apply a mere transitive property in the reasoning (i.e. since Bologna is in Italy, what is not typical in Italy is also not typical in Bologna), because it leads to fallacious conclusions. Elsewhere in Italy, where the dish is not rooted in local culture, people may occasionally make such a pasta-sauce combination. This however does not make the dish typical, just a spurious combination. To make another example, in the north of Italy you would easily find people making carbonara with Parmigiano-Reggiano rather than pecorino romano: this does not align with Roman tradition, where such a combination would not exist, but also does not "generate" a new non-Roman Italian tradition of carbonara. It is precisely this exceptionally strong distinction between regional cuisines, as well as the difference between the total absence of a tradition in its place of origin vs. its occasional presence in other places of the country not accounting to a definition of a non-local tradition, that IMO justifies the current phrasing as not necessarily redundant.

Adding sources is never a problem (I spotted some minor inaccuracies in the articles, but nothing major), so feel free to add them ;) --Desyman (talk) 16:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 5 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

---

Bolognese sauce → Bolognese ragù – for consistency (see Neapolitan ragù). JacktheBrown (talk) 19:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose. OP has cited no evidence (WP:COMMONNAME) for the proposed title. There is no requirement for consistency with any other articles. 162 etc. (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME in the English language. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose. I don't see why we need to change the title. Waqar💬 18:36, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.