Talk:Blohm & Voss BV 40
Appearance
Blohm & Voss BV 40 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 25, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blohm & Voss BV 40 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Huh?
[edit]"Its key features were a very narrow (and thus hard to hit) cross section as result of being a glider..." Why does the fact that its a glider make a difference to the cross-section? Can somebody with a better understanding of aerodynamics clarify this part, please? WikiReaderer 20:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
The cross section was narrow because there was no engine. Compare the cross section of the Bv 40 with that of the Bf 109 or Fw 190. 2603:800C:3944:BC00:1D87:FB75:E69E:9E61 (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class gliding articles
- WikiProject Gliding articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles