This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
the media matters source is 404'd and has not been archived. it plainly is not in the newsweek source. i was going to just remove it, but im unsure how best to reword the surrounding sentences. 2birds1stone (talk) 09:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Can the info of assigned male at birth be added to the Early Life section? I had to do some off-Wikipedia googling to piece together she was AMAB, transitioned, and identifies as a transgender woman. Transgender could mean AFAB, AMAB, or otherwise, so this article isn’t giving the right context for her identity. To be clear, I am *not* asking for deadnaming or a pronoun shift. —2601:8C0:380:35C0:80A4:AB22:4B58:2082 (talk) 21:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Also worth noting that if her having done those things required piecing together sources, that may constitute as synthesis, which Wikipedia disallows. We'd want reliable sources, or clear statements from herself publicly, to write that information in wiki-voice. —Sirdog(talk) 08:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
is "LGBTQ+" news site really a reputable organization that is worth taking seriously when it comes to accusing someone of being "far right" especially when the accusation doesn't actually contain any beliefs blaire has that could be described as far right, it says
"Though White’s boost in the right-wing space came with her appearance on Alex Jones’ far-right conspiracy theory show InfoWars. On the show, in August 2023, Jones asked White if “chemicals” were involved in making her trans" which is what Jones said, not White
and the accusation of far-right came from trans-activist, eli erlick, the article doesn't even explicitly endorse erlick's claim, so the article doesn't even definitively accuse blaire of being far-right, even if it did PinkNews is a very questionable source for a claim like that anyway
This seems like it was added by one of blaire's haters trying to discredit her as her political views have not particularly changed since the time blaire described herself as "centre-right"
while it is technically true that blaire has been described as having ties to the far right, it is only one person, and this individual has specific political motivations to accuse people of being far-right without a good reason to 78.150.88.150 (talk) 13:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: "Her views have been described as..." is an adqueate statement. The article does not say that White's views ARE far right, it says they have been DESCRIBED as far right. Further, per WP:PINKNEWS, Pink News IS considered a reliable source for WP. PianoDan (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 07:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Note: Also worth noting that if her having done those things required piecing together sources, that may constitute as synthesis, which Wikipedia disallows. We'd want reliable sources, or clear statements from herself publicly, to write that information in wiki-voice. —Sirdog (talk) 08:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
In progress: An editor is implementing the requested edit. Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 05:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done: "Her views have been described as..." is an adqueate statement. The article does not say that White's views ARE far right, it says they have been DESCRIBED as far right. Further, per WP:PINKNEWS, Pink News IS considered a reliable source for WP. PianoDan (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)