Talk:Bill Roe (cricketer)
Appearance
Bill Roe (cricketer) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 16, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Bill Roe (cricketer) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bill Roe (cricketer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 18:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
Only a couple comments:
- "He achieved notability in 1881, when he made the highest score in cricket at the time." and "Roe gained cricketing fame in the summer of 1881..." seem to refer to the same thing. As the latter goes into more detail and explains Roe's notability, you can drop the first instance, as it doesn't need to be repeated, especially in the lead.
- Cut this out of the first paragraph, and tweaked it in the second for clarity, how's that? Harrias talk 21:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- The latter half of the first paragraph in the "highest score in cricket" section has no citations, which considering it makes some important claims is necessary.
- Just finding this – thanks for your patience! Harrias talk 21:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Other than those minor issues seems like it should be good. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Looks good to me now. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- GA-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- GA-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Europe cricket articles
- Europe cricket task force articles
- Somerset cricket task force articles
- WikiProject Cricket articles