Talk:Bicchugatti

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 25 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bicchugatti: Chapter 1 − Dalvayi Dange → Bicchugatti – Per WP:COMMON NAME, name per most sources. Chapter 1 and especially the Dalvayi Dange part seem to be tagline, see WP:TAGLINE. All of the sources on this page use Bicchugatti and one uses Bicchugatti: Chapter 1. Most of the reviews don't use the full name: [1] [2]. [3] review uses the full name only in the body of text but not in the article title. DareshMohan (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.