This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. G4 does not apply as the article is different enough to the one that was deleted. While it exists it should be at the proper title. Of course there is on prejudice against a new AfD, but it does seem she has won a notable award in the interim. Jenks24 (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There is always a reason why any destination is create-protected. The original Bhumi Pednekar article was previously deleted in March 2015 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhumi Pednekar. That original argument was that she was not notable at that time to warrant a stand alone article, since she had only appeared in one project: Dum Laga Ke Haisha. Has this consensus changed, or the reason for this deletion no longer applies? Otherwise, this should get deleted again under WP:G4. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Hi @Krimuk2.0: I disagree with you here. Going down the tree of disambiguation, we would care about the nation first, then the language, then any sort of ethnic identification, if relevant, which I don't think it is. We should consider that not everybody in the world knows what Hindi is, and far fewer know what Telugu or Tamil or Odia are. Making the content understandable should be our first goal, and we likely wouldn't say "She appears in Odia films" because few non-Indians would know what that is. (And no, wikilinking isn't how we make content understandable.) "Odia-language" would be the correct compound adjective to describe the films that person appears in, and then the primary topic is the language, not the ethnic film industry. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cyphoidbomb My understanding is that we link to Bollywood, which links to the appropriate film industry (which is where she works), where the user can find a wikilink to the language Hindi. Alternately, the opening statement might say, "...Indian film actress who works in Hindi-language films of Bollywood" to avoid confusion. However, the common practice in FA-articles, such as Kareena Kapoor, Preity Zinta, and Shah Rukh Khan has been to link to the industry and not the language. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Krimuk2.0: Well, I don't plan to fight anybody here about it, and I hope you don't think I'm giving you a hard time specifically, but taking examples from the melting pot nation, Brad Pitt works in the Hollywood film industry, yet there is no link for that. No link for Woody Allen working in a culturally Jewish film industry. They are American actors, and if they produced films in a language other than English, the third level of our taxonomy would be language. Did Cheech Marin, whose films are in English, work in the Chicano film industry? Ethnic industry is not typically the focus. Anyhow, that's my opinion. It may be unpopular. Feel free to use it or ignore it. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's because saying one is an "American actor" is sufficient, as America has only one film industry, and that's Hollywood. India has many: Bollywood, Telugu cinema], Tamil cinema, Cinema of West Bengal, and many others, which is why we can't compare American actors with Indian actors. Each of these industry is based on language, and that's obvious from the nomenclature. I still fail to see why it's being seen any different. There are proper wikipedia articles to these industries as opposed to a Jewish film industry or a Chicano film industry. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)