Talk:Bellingham Square station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this article within the week. eviolite (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

---

• Sourcing, images good
• For the lead, add a qualifier like "the newly constructed" before Chelsea station in the last sentence, for clarity
  •  Done
• Unless I'm missing something, "Washington Street" should be "Washington Avenue" in all mentions (including in history)
  •  Done
• "The remaining commuter rail platform is located on the north side of the two tracks, with a metal shelter. The station is accessible for Silver Line buses but not commuter rail." - since commuter rail no longer stops at the station I would clarify with something like "disused" (and I don't know if accessibility for the rail platforms are necessary for the same reason)
  •  Done Updated the wording.
• I'm a bit confused, can't see where on the map it suggests that Route 111 runs on Broadway (it looks to be a different road from 116/117)
  •  Done
• Link Revere, Massachusetts and main line (railway)
  •  Done
• Per Wikipedia:Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles#Original research, "in the 1880s or 1890s." should probably be "by the 1890s".
  •  Done
• Not sure why there's an ellipsis after "Danvers River drawbridge"
  •  Done It was my addition, but I have no idea why. Perhaps a stray kitty paw.
• There's a mention of "right of way" before the link - should move the link up (and change it to use "right-of-way" for consistency)
  •  Done

@Pi.1415926535: putting on hold. eviolite (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@Eviolite: Thanks for the review! I've implemented all your recommendations. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Happy to promote now, another fine piece of work. eviolite (talk) 02:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)