Talk:Battle of Ramkani

Military history: National / Asian / British / European / Indian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Sikhism

This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism

Pakistan: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Punjab

	Punjab portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punjab, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Punjab on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PunjabWikipedia:WikiProject PunjabTemplate:WikiProject PunjabPunjab-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Ip user

Can you please provide sources stating the battle was a Sikh victory? Editing the page and adding unsourced content with edit warring is not helping improve the page.

@154.80.8.229 Noorullah (talk) 06:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RaeesAbbas22 Please bring your concerns to the talk page instead of removing sourced content. Noorullah (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the battle of Ramkani Afghans failed to capture peshawer and retreated from battlefield, this was a defeat for Afghans.

And Sikhs successfully defended peshawer city from Afghans, this was a victory for sikhs.

Creater of this page wrote that in this battle Sikhs got victory but you are editing again and again. RaeesAbbas22 (talk) 02:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because the main attributed source states that the Afghans only withdrew. The Battle of Ramkani wasn't for Peshawar. @RaeesAbbas22 Noorullah (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, battle was for peshawer. Dost Mohammad Khan's main objective was capture of peshawer. RaeesAbbas22 (talk) 02:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, battle was for peshawer. Dost Mohammad Khan's main objective was capture of peshawer. And he failed. RaeesAbbas22 (talk) 04:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, see the sources, stop replacing sourced content with unsourced information. @RaeesAbbas22 Noorullah (talk) 14:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The specific source in the infobox you removed doesn’t state any Sikh victory. Noorullah (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Result

So after 12 hours of fighting the afghans simply decided to leave. Seems like a retreat, who fights a battle for 12 hours just to withdraw. Someone that was clearly losing. Withdraw just seems to be the nicer way of saying retreat. Historian2325 (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also forgot to mention the hypocrisy with the battle of Kashmir 1814 being allowed to state Afghan victory even though Sikhs had to leave due to the weather, disease and delay of reinforcements but ramkanki is allowed to be inconclusive with Afghan withdrawal Historian2325 (talk) 00:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]