Talk:Battle of Ramadi (2014–2015)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Ramadi (2014–2015) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Battle of Ramadi (2014–2015) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 May 2015.

Wikipedia

Iraq Mid‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Why is there no map?

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

A map of where this city is located is pretty much essential, can someone add it?142.161.97.237 (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that a map of the city and its environs would be a big upgrade for the article. Jus da fax 15:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tactical use of truck bombs

I don't know if it adds anything to the story or not, but it seems that this article outlines some key differences in the use of improvised explosive vehicle borne devices. They were used tactically with coordination of other assaults on the city. They were also of an unusually large size and sophisitication. Again, I don't know if it's appropriate to add to the story, but does seem somewhat important or new. http://news.yahoo.com/truck-bombs-islamic-states-air-force-222500105.html (the original source is in french, which i don't speak) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.49.6.225 (talk) 08:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My English sucks, but...

In the Article:

On November 27, 2015 Iraqi forces have cut ISIL's last supply line into the city of Ramadi by seizing a key bridge, Iraqi officials and a military officer On 26 November.[111]

This is no real sentence too or? I mean the end, it is written strange and makes no sense... they told it on 26 November and it happened on 27 November? Do they have a time machine? xD Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 14:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

split into 2nd battle of Ramadi?

Should we split it into two pages, one for the first one and another for the current one? Emigdioofmiami (talk) 22:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per @Emigdioofmiami:. Too much has happened since may that it needs another article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 300 Isis fighters wont give a fight for more than a week.Mr.User200 (talk) 13:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:CRYSTAL unless you can provide a source saying so. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support major battle could take weeks... Sukhoi 24 (talk) 14:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, clearly different events. —Nightstallion 14:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As Nightstallion noted, that these are different events is just obvious.Aldux (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Separate event, separate battle, separate article. EkoGraf (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support See, for example, Battle of Dunkirk v. Siege of Dunkirk (1944) JaneStillman (talk) 11:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a wholly separate event, differently from the battle of Aleppo. --Mach1988 (talk) 15:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Ramadi is a key city. Also I would recommend a map that shows areas of control. I'm pretty sure more information could be added as well to be honest.--Arbutus the tree (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is the turning point of possibly the entire war for Iraq, and deserves its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.228.135.189 (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think there is a consensus here. Can this split be implemented? The sooner the better in my opinion, as many people will be looking to Wikipedia for information about this ongoing and important battle. --Philpill691 (talk) 23:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and created a second page under Battle of Ramadi (2015–Present). we'll need to do some fixing to make it more in flow with this wiki's standards a bit. edit away. Emigdioofmiami (talk) 02:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the Battle

Well, excuse me for asking, but " American crusaders" ? "Apostates" ? "Caliphate Forces" ? Did an ISIL fan rewrite this article ?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Battle of Ramadi (2014–15). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ramadi Mosque 2004.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]