Talk:Battle of Kaliabor
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Kaliabor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Missing source?
[edit]@ImperialAficionado, thank-you for the article! Could you possibly double-check reference #4? The source, Roy (1951), seems to be missing from the bibliography. If you use {{harv}}/{{sfn}} references frequently you may find this script useful – it highlights any problems with sfn references such as missing or duplicate sources. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Wham! Imperial[AFCND] 23:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class India articles
- Unknown-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
- B-Class Indian history articles
- Unknown-importance Indian history articles
- B-Class Indian history articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles