Talk:Bath Preservation Trust

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No. 1 Royal Crescent

@Sumorsǣte: The section about No. 1 Royal Crescent might be better in a separate article, rather than being included here or in Royal Crescent. As it's a museum, I think it's notable enough on its own. What do you/others think? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. A new article drawn from what's in this article and the Royal Crescent article, with its own relevant categories etc. Sumorsǣte (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumorsǣte: OK. :-) Do you want to have a go at doing this, or would you like me to? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bit busy in the next few days, so I'm happy for you to crack on with the new article. I've linked to it from the visitor attractions article already. Cheers. Sumorsǣte (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, article started at No. 1 Royal Crescent. Please help fill it out. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]