Talk:Bath City F.C./GA2

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 08:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look over this shortly. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 08:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

2. Verifiable with no original research:

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);

it contains no original research; and

it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

2a. This one is pretty simple; the article has a list of references in an appropriately titled section.
2b. A few sources I'm concerned about. Please either demonstrate how each of the following meet WP:RS, or remove them as sources:
www.bufc.drfox.org.uk
bathcityfcarchive.x10host.com
mtannersports.com
Football-Stadiums.co.uk
bath-braunschweigtwinningassociation.co.uk
thekitman.co.uk
footballgroundmap.com
gloverscast.co.uk
footballgroundguide.com
ozwhitelufc.net.au
a-love-supreme.com
rokerreport.sbnation.com
playupliverpool.com
englandfootballonline.com
pogmogoal.com (website isn't working)
plymouth.vitalfootball.co.uk
margatefootballclubhistory.com
tigerroar.co.uk
national-football-teams.com

I'm going to hold off on the 2c and 2d spotchecks to give you time to look into these. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph1891: Just checking if you'd seen this. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 07:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias, just an FYI in case you hadn't seen this discussion following on from the previous review. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No response after two and a half weeks, and over twelve days since I pinged the nominator a reminder. I'm going to fail this based on the sourcing issues raised above. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.