Talk:Bancor

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bancor article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Whoo-boy. Somebody needs to edit this article for spelling errors, but I don't understand the subject matter enough to want to stick my nose into it. Rcarlberg (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Milton Friedman section

Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.6.10 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Half or more of the article has nothing to do with bancor as a concept. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

neturality needs to be kept in the article

This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bancor is now the name of a company (June 2017)

This company named Bancor just raised US$150 million in capital. Found this article; would expect other reliable sources in tomorrow's business press. Interesting. http://www.coindesk.com/150-million-tim-draper-backed-bancor-completes-largest-ever-ico/ N2e (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]