Talk:Badchen

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

bad translation?

"has to be born both to provide the energy " etc. "Born" means "be given birth to." That doesn't fit with the sense of the rest of the sentence. Find somebody who knows both the language of the source and English and figure out what this would should have been. 100.15.120.122 (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You can see that it was written well, "able", but in March 2015 someone changed it to "able". Corrected it.--Arsenal sin platea (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

have made some pretty big changes to the article

Although the article in its previous form was not too bad (not a lot of incorrect information, at least), it lacked many citations or recent references. I have tried to build up the articles with some more detailed citations from Feldman, Rubin, and others. It was hard to figure out how to source information about the present day Hasidic badkhn tradition. That is one section that I think should be expanded. Another thing I wasn't sure is whether I should try to include any examples of their traditional couplets, score, sound clips, or anything. Open to suggestions.--Dan Carkner (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]