Talk:Bactrocera tryoni

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bactrocera tryoni is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Diptera Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olivia.urso. Peer reviewers: Lelandra, Eengermann, JustinLevin.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioral Ecology

I updated some hyperlinks to add more info to this page and evaluated it on the quality of the page as C-class. (Y.shiuan) 09:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very well-written and well-thought-out article! I made minor changes to the inconsistent formatting of a few of the in-text references and made a couple stylistic word changes, but other than that the article was excellent. Great work, Olivia. (Eengermann) — Preceding undated comment added 00:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely like to see what additions you make to this page if you continue to use B. tryoni in your next Wiki assignment. This article was very interesting! I would like to see more pictures added to the page, but overall, it was clear and effectively communicated. lelandra 03:35, 17 October 2019

Overall a very well-written article. I added some hyperlinks throughout the various sections that will make understanding easier for the reader, as well as elaborated on the fruit punctures that you discuss in the Life Cycle section. Going forward, I think a discussion on the importance of the white eye locus on potential genomic studies/identifiable traits for experiments could be beneficial to the article as a whole. JustinLevin 10:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend adding more information to the identification section, take out the extensive list of fruits in the Host Selection section, and add more citations to the Life Cycle section. Overall a great article!Hannahwhite97 (talk) 03:27, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As wiki expert, I edited out the references in the lead section (that were already contained within the main article). I left reference 1 in there because that wasn’t used anywhere else, but it seems like another reference already covered that info in the distribution section. I suggest that reference 1 simply be deleted as it doesn’t add anything new. I looked through the rest of the article to make sure it followed the order given in the project diptera guidelines. I also went through and added in hyperlinks as there weren’t many, especially for specific terms like SIT and sister species. Finally, I went through and made sure there were no wiki code errors and other coding problems. Over, this is a good continuation of her fly that added on a lot of interesting info. Y.shiuan (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Great article! It was pretty engaging to read. I made some mild sentence structure rearrangements, did some hyperlinking, and fixed some tense issues. Some of your sentences, I feel, would be benefitted by adding some extra detail to it:

Your sentence, “Eggs hatch into white larvae in 2–4 days under favorable weather conditions” in the “Life cycle” section should maybe specify what those specific, favorable weather conditions are.

Your sentence in the “Identification” section: “Adults hold their wings horizontally when walking and flick them in a specific, characteristic manner.” What manner is that exactly? A little confused on that sentence.

Isn’t the last sentence in your lead section more of a speculation sentence? Not quite sure if it can be there (although I do agree with its premise).andrewoh29 (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was very well written and there wasn't very much for me to edit. I added some hyperlinks as well to help make the article give the reader a better idea of the fly. Overall, great job! I can tell you are actually interested in your fly! KendalTLee (talk) 03:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent typo (?) 48 times in article

The shorthand B. tyroni appears 48 times in this article. It appears to me the r and y have been transposed, but I'm not an insect expert so I have refrained from editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.241.106 (talk) 03:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]