Talk:Bachata Number 1's, Vol. 3

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bachata Number 1's, Vol. 3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bachata Number 1's, Vol. 3 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 30, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Latin music: Tropical music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Tropical music task force.

Caribbean: Dominican Republic Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Dominican Republic portal This article is supported by WikiProject Dominican Republic (assessed as Low-importance).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

A fact from Bachata Number 1's, Vol. 3 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 May 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that only five of the twelve tracks on Bachata #1's, Vol. 3 are actually number-one singles?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bachata Number 1's, Vol. 3.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bachata Number 1's, Vol. 3/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 03:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a review sometime tomorrow. Wizardman 03:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

"The first two in the series were released in 2008 and 2009 respectively." comma before respectively.
"The bachata-infused-R&B number," no comma needed, though I know that makes the reference right there a bit iffy.
""Jasmine" is Dominican bachata group Grupo Rush's, which is composed of Damian, Migz, Lenny, and Khriz, single from their debut album We On Fire (2009)" the member splice between Rush's and single makes this sentence hard to read; reword.
"It reached #6 on the" all the other numbers are written out; make consistent

Not much to fix, I'll put the article on hold and pass when fixed. Wizardman 16:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed your raised issues. Thank you for your review. — Diva Knockouts 18:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, article passes. Wizardman 20:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]