Talk:BaBar experiment
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Shouldn't the amount of stored charge be measured in Coulomb rather than in Ampere? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.187.47.100 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually no. It's stored current. The electrons move around the storage rings, and so Ampere is the correct terminology. It is also what the BaBar experiment call it. aLii 15:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
The "Notable Events" section is somewhat out of date. It could be updated with the current luminosity record of just over 1.2x10^34. Also, a couple of the reference links are now dead. Josh Thompson 00:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Institutions List
[edit]Is there any value to the long list of institutions? It really detracts from the readability of the page, and it will be a pain to keep accurate. At the least, shouldn't it be moved to its own page?
-- Josh Thompson 17:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually it won't change, BaBar turned off a few months ago, so this article needs an overhaul to the past tense. I agree about the readability, but I don't think it deserves its own page, we just need to put it in a table format. The readability will increase if some things are added: the DIRC, motivation for the experiment, the dataset... I'll tell you what, I'll be working on my thesis in a couple of months. I'll try and give it a great overhaul then, if no one gets to it first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.146.33.130 (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- To be accurate it changed this year. The university of Tel Aviv (Israel) and Guwahati (India) joined the Collaboration this year. That the experiment stopped data taking does not mean that the collaboration is dead! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.226.86.237 (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on BaBar experiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051016010355/http://www.slac.stanford.edu:80/front_page_continue.html to http://www.slac.stanford.edu/front_page_continue.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Why did it shutdown in 2008
[edit]Why did it shutdown in 2008 ? (frustrating given the 3.4 sigma report in 2012) Why was the integrated luminosity less in final few years ? Could mention in a history section ? - Rod57 (talk) 21:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)